TY - JOUR
T1 - Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in the treatment of esophageal cancer patients
AU - Martini, Stefania
AU - Arcadipane, Francesca
AU - Strignano, Paolo
AU - Spadi, Rosella
AU - Contu, Viviana
AU - Fiandra, Christian
AU - Ragona, Riccardo
AU - Catalano, Giorgia
AU - Satolli, Maria Antonietta
AU - Camandona, Michele
AU - Romagnoli, Renato
AU - Ricardi, Umberto
AU - Franco, Pierfrancesco
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2018/12/1
Y1 - 2018/12/1
N2 - The aim of the study is to evaluate feasibility, safety, toxicity profile, and dosimetric results of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to deliver definitive or pre-operative radiation in locally advanced esophageal cancer patients. A total of 68 patients were treated with VMAT between March 2014 and March 2018 (44% vs 56% for definitive and neoadjuvant settings, respectively). Dose prescription differed depending on the clinical scenario (54–60 Gy in 30 fractions for definitive treatments; 41.4/45 Gy in 23–25 fractions in the pre-operative setting). Most of the patients were given concurrent chemotherapy. Two coplanar and one non-coplanar arcs were employed for VMAT delivery. Treatment was generally well tolerated. Acute toxicity was generally mild. In patients treated with definitive intent, ≥ G3 toxicities were observed for esophagitis (30%), anorexia (26.7%), fatigue (26.7%), nausea (6.7%), and vomiting (3.3%). In patients treated within a neoadjuvant approach, ≥ G3 anorexia (21%), esophagitis (15.8%), fatigue (13.3%), nausea (5.3%), and vomiting (2.6%) were observed. Dosimetric results were consistent in term of both target coverage and normal tissue sparing. In conclusion, VMAT proved to be a feasible, safe, and effective strategy to deliver definitive or pre-operative radiation in locally advanced esophageal cancer patients.
AB - The aim of the study is to evaluate feasibility, safety, toxicity profile, and dosimetric results of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to deliver definitive or pre-operative radiation in locally advanced esophageal cancer patients. A total of 68 patients were treated with VMAT between March 2014 and March 2018 (44% vs 56% for definitive and neoadjuvant settings, respectively). Dose prescription differed depending on the clinical scenario (54–60 Gy in 30 fractions for definitive treatments; 41.4/45 Gy in 23–25 fractions in the pre-operative setting). Most of the patients were given concurrent chemotherapy. Two coplanar and one non-coplanar arcs were employed for VMAT delivery. Treatment was generally well tolerated. Acute toxicity was generally mild. In patients treated with definitive intent, ≥ G3 toxicities were observed for esophagitis (30%), anorexia (26.7%), fatigue (26.7%), nausea (6.7%), and vomiting (3.3%). In patients treated within a neoadjuvant approach, ≥ G3 anorexia (21%), esophagitis (15.8%), fatigue (13.3%), nausea (5.3%), and vomiting (2.6%) were observed. Dosimetric results were consistent in term of both target coverage and normal tissue sparing. In conclusion, VMAT proved to be a feasible, safe, and effective strategy to deliver definitive or pre-operative radiation in locally advanced esophageal cancer patients.
KW - Chemoradiation
KW - Esophageal cancer
KW - Gastro-esophageal junction
KW - IMRT
KW - Pre-operative treatments
KW - Radiotherapy
KW - VMAT
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054429067&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12032-018-1211-7
DO - 10.1007/s12032-018-1211-7
M3 - Article
SN - 1357-0560
VL - 35
JO - Medical Oncology
JF - Medical Oncology
IS - 12
M1 - 150
ER -