TY - JOUR
T1 - Use of Simulated Patients in Disaster Medicine Training: A Systematic Review
AU - Ingrassia, Pier Luigi
AU - Pigozzi, Luca
AU - Bono, Mattia
AU - RAGAZZONI, Luca
AU - DELLA CORTE, Francesco
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2020 Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Simulation is an effective teaching tool in disaster medicine education, and the use of simulated patients (SPs) is a frequently adopted technique. Throughout this article, we critically analyzed the use and the preparation of SPs in the context of simulation in disaster medicine. A systematic review of English, French, and Italian language articles was performed on PubMed and Google Scholar. Studies were included if reporting the use of SPs in disaster medicine training. Exclusion criteria included abstracts, citations, theses, articles not dealing with disaster medicine, and articles not using human actors in simulation. Eighteen papers were examined. All the studies were conducted in Western countries. Case reports represent 50% of references. Only in 44.4% of articles, the beneficiaries of simulations were students, while in most of cases were professionals. In 61.1% of studies SPs were moulaged, and in 72.2%, a method to simulate victim symptoms was adopted. Ten papers included a previous training for SPs and their involvement in the participants' assessment at the end of the simulation. Finally, this systematic review revealed that there is still a lack of uniformity about the use of SPs in the disaster medicine simulations.
AB - Simulation is an effective teaching tool in disaster medicine education, and the use of simulated patients (SPs) is a frequently adopted technique. Throughout this article, we critically analyzed the use and the preparation of SPs in the context of simulation in disaster medicine. A systematic review of English, French, and Italian language articles was performed on PubMed and Google Scholar. Studies were included if reporting the use of SPs in disaster medicine training. Exclusion criteria included abstracts, citations, theses, articles not dealing with disaster medicine, and articles not using human actors in simulation. Eighteen papers were examined. All the studies were conducted in Western countries. Case reports represent 50% of references. Only in 44.4% of articles, the beneficiaries of simulations were students, while in most of cases were professionals. In 61.1% of studies SPs were moulaged, and in 72.2%, a method to simulate victim symptoms was adopted. Ten papers included a previous training for SPs and their involvement in the participants' assessment at the end of the simulation. Finally, this systematic review revealed that there is still a lack of uniformity about the use of SPs in the disaster medicine simulations.
KW - disaster medicine
KW - simulated patient
KW - simulation
KW - standardized patient
KW - training
KW - disaster medicine
KW - simulated patient
KW - simulation
KW - standardized patient
KW - training
UR - https://iris.uniupo.it/handle/11579/108825
U2 - 10.1017/dmp.2019.111
DO - 10.1017/dmp.2019.111
M3 - Article
SN - 1935-7893
SP - 1-6-6
JO - Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
JF - Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
ER -