Unmet clinical need e nuovi farmaci

  • Francesca Caprari
  • , Alessandro Alfano
  • , Giuliano Buzzetti
  • , Agostino Consoli
  • , Filippo De Braud
  • , Francesca Patarnello
  • , Andrea Pitrelli
  • , Massimo Riccaboni
  • , Giuseppe Rossi
  • , Riccardo Samele
  • , Dario Scaduto
  • , Pierluigi Viale
  • , Claudio Jommi
  • , Patrizia Popoli

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo su rivistaArticolo di reviewpeer review

Abstract

The debate around unmet clinical need (UCN) is still very much alive. How do we define UCN? How does it influence the definition of clinically relevant outcomes in a therapeutic area? Who defines UCN? What are the consequences of recognizing different grading of UCN? In this paper we will address these questions and finally formulate proposals for the Italian context. The paper is based on a discussion within a panel of experts. This topic is even more stimulating as this work takes place in a historical period which, on the one hand, sees the start of a new course of negotiation rules recently published by AIFA and, on the other hand, poses unprecedented challenges that emerged during the pandemic crisis. The working group formulated suggestions and proposals to further enhance the role of the UCN in decision-making processes, also in the light of the new negotiation procedure, and to help refine the tools for grading the UCN and the value of medicines in the interests of patients and society as a whole.
Titolo tradotto del contributoUnmet clinical need and new therapeutic options
Lingua originaleItalian
pagine (da-a)161-166
Numero di pagine6
RivistaRecenti Progressi in Medicina
Volume113
Numero di pubblicazione3
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - mar 2022
Pubblicato esternamente

Keywords

  • Health regulatory
  • New therapeutic options
  • Unmet clinical need

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Unmet clinical need e nuovi farmaci'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo