TY - JOUR
T1 - Uncertainty and Fake News: An Experimental Study on the Strategic Use of Fake News in Belief Formation
AU - Buso, Irene Maria
AU - BENZI, MARGHERITA
AU - NOVARESE, Marco
AU - Sillari, Giacomo
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - This paper investigates the strategic role of low-informative signals – conceptualized as fake
news – in shaping belief formation and influencing decision-making under uncertainty. Build
ing on the experimental frameworks of Exley (2016) and Garcia et al. (2020), we introduce a
novel design that mimics real-world misinformation through signals that are true but partial,
fostering biased beliefs. Specifically, we test whether such signals influence individuals to fa
vor self-serving options, particularly when the misleading information aligns with their self
interest. Our results show strong evidence of excuse-driven behavior under risk-for-self,
which is exacerbated by low-informative signals. Notably, the bias induced by weak signals
diminishes when outcomes primarily benefit others, highlighting the strategic alignment of be
lief distortion with self-interest. These findings underscore the broader philosophical and em
pirical importance of understanding how partial information influences motivated reasoning
and decision-making, contributing to the literature on misinformation, motivated beliefs, and
behavioral economics.
AB - This paper investigates the strategic role of low-informative signals – conceptualized as fake
news – in shaping belief formation and influencing decision-making under uncertainty. Build
ing on the experimental frameworks of Exley (2016) and Garcia et al. (2020), we introduce a
novel design that mimics real-world misinformation through signals that are true but partial,
fostering biased beliefs. Specifically, we test whether such signals influence individuals to fa
vor self-serving options, particularly when the misleading information aligns with their self
interest. Our results show strong evidence of excuse-driven behavior under risk-for-self,
which is exacerbated by low-informative signals. Notably, the bias induced by weak signals
diminishes when outcomes primarily benefit others, highlighting the strategic alignment of be
lief distortion with self-interest. These findings underscore the broader philosophical and em
pirical importance of understanding how partial information influences motivated reasoning
and decision-making, contributing to the literature on misinformation, motivated beliefs, and
behavioral economics.
KW - Excuse-driven behaviour
KW - Risk
KW - Information Disclosure
KW - Excuse-driven behaviour
KW - Risk
KW - Information Disclosure
UR - https://iris.uniupo.it/handle/11579/208962
U2 - 10.17473/2240-7987-2024-2-12
DO - 10.17473/2240-7987-2024-2-12
M3 - Article
SN - 2240-7987
VL - NS 14
SP - 389
EP - 406
JO - FILOSOFIA E QUESTIONI PUBBLICHE
JF - FILOSOFIA E QUESTIONI PUBBLICHE
IS - 2
ER -