TY - JOUR
T1 - Two-Year Turning Point With Dupilumab in CRSwNP
T2 - Control, Remission, and Tapering Dosage
AU - Dupireal Italian Study Group
AU - De Corso, Eugenio
AU - Montuori, Claudio
AU - Pipolo, Carlotta
AU - La Mantia, Ignazio
AU - Pasquini, Ernesto
AU - Ghidini, Angelo
AU - Seccia, Veronica
AU - Ottaviano, Giancarlo
AU - Cantone, Elena
AU - Dané, Giulia
AU - Garzaro, Massimiliano
AU - Fadda, Gian Luca
AU - Torretta, Sara
AU - Anastasi, Francesca
AU - Canevari, Frank Rikki Mauritz
AU - Pagella, Fabio
AU - Lucidi, Daniela
AU - Cavaliere, Carlo
AU - Pagliuca, Giulio
AU - Maffei, Marianna
AU - Bussu, Francesco
AU - Corbò, Marco
AU - D′Auria, Leandro Maria
AU - De Maio, Gabriele
AU - Loperfido, Antonella
AU - Gallo, Stefania
AU - D′Agostino, Giuseppe
AU - Giannarelli, Diana
AU - Galli, Jacopo
AU - Aluffi Valletti, Paolo
AU - Alicandri Ciufelli, Matteo
AU - Astolfi, Laura
AU - Battilocchi, Ludovica
AU - Begvarfaj, Elona
AU - Bernardi, Riccardo
AU - Caramia, Riccardo
AU - Caruso, Mario
AU - Cavallo, Giovanni
AU - Ciofalo, Andrea
AU - Clemenzi, Veronica
AU - Cozzi, Anna
AU - Crescio, Claudia
AU - Mencacci, Lodovica Cristofani
AU - Dell’Era, Valeria
AU - De Vita, Carla
AU - Di Bella, Giuseppe Alberto
AU - Di Nola, Claudio
AU - Dohin, Isabelle
AU - Farneti, Paolo
AU - Ferrella, Francesco
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background: Dupilumab is an effective treatment for severe, uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Most real-life studies have been conducted on small patient cohorts for up to 1 year. Methods: This ambispective, multicentric, 2-year-long study evaluated dupilumab effectiveness (including treatment response, disease control, and remission) and safety in severe, uncontrolled CRSwNP patients from the DUPIREAL Italian study centers. Results: The study involved 926 patients. At 24 months, median nasal polyp score (NPS), nasal obstruction visual analogue scale (VAS), Sino-nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22), and olfaction improved from baseline (all p < 0.0001). Patients with NPS > 4, and/or SNOT-22 > 30, and/or Sniffin’ Sticks Identification Test-16 (SSIT-16) < 12 at 12 months demonstrated improvements in these outcomes over the second year. Overall, 18.7% of patients extended the dupilumab interdose interval to every 4 weeks (q4w). Notably, 91.2% of patients were “good-to-excellent” responders based on EPOS/Euforea criteria. Given the absence of standardized definitions for disease control and remission, we proposed different sets of criteria reporting results from different scenarios. Remission analysis is clinically important as it helps define treatment success and long-term therapeutic goals. Most adverse events were mild-to-moderate; 2.4% of patients discontinued treatment due to safety concerns. Conclusions: This is the largest real-life study evaluating dupilumab in CRSwNP over 2 years. Dupilumab showed sustained effectiveness, with progressive improvements across all clinical outcomes. Dupilumab tapering did not compromise outcomes; treatment continuation allowed meaningful clinical benefits in late responders. Two-year rates of disease control and remission are clinically relevant, although standardized criteria to assess these outcomes are needed.
AB - Background: Dupilumab is an effective treatment for severe, uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Most real-life studies have been conducted on small patient cohorts for up to 1 year. Methods: This ambispective, multicentric, 2-year-long study evaluated dupilumab effectiveness (including treatment response, disease control, and remission) and safety in severe, uncontrolled CRSwNP patients from the DUPIREAL Italian study centers. Results: The study involved 926 patients. At 24 months, median nasal polyp score (NPS), nasal obstruction visual analogue scale (VAS), Sino-nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22), and olfaction improved from baseline (all p < 0.0001). Patients with NPS > 4, and/or SNOT-22 > 30, and/or Sniffin’ Sticks Identification Test-16 (SSIT-16) < 12 at 12 months demonstrated improvements in these outcomes over the second year. Overall, 18.7% of patients extended the dupilumab interdose interval to every 4 weeks (q4w). Notably, 91.2% of patients were “good-to-excellent” responders based on EPOS/Euforea criteria. Given the absence of standardized definitions for disease control and remission, we proposed different sets of criteria reporting results from different scenarios. Remission analysis is clinically important as it helps define treatment success and long-term therapeutic goals. Most adverse events were mild-to-moderate; 2.4% of patients discontinued treatment due to safety concerns. Conclusions: This is the largest real-life study evaluating dupilumab in CRSwNP over 2 years. Dupilumab showed sustained effectiveness, with progressive improvements across all clinical outcomes. Dupilumab tapering did not compromise outcomes; treatment continuation allowed meaningful clinical benefits in late responders. Two-year rates of disease control and remission are clinically relevant, although standardized criteria to assess these outcomes are needed.
KW - CRSwNP
KW - control
KW - dupilumab
KW - late response
KW - long term
KW - remission
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105015414836
U2 - 10.1111/all.70032
DO - 10.1111/all.70032
M3 - Article
SN - 0105-4538
JO - Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
JF - Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
ER -