TY - JOUR
T1 - Trends and social barriers for inpatient palliative care in patients with metastatic bladder cancer receiving critical care therapies
AU - Mazzone, Elio
AU - Knipper, Sophie
AU - Mistretta, Francesco A.
AU - Palumbo, Crlotta
AU - Tian, Zhe
AU - Gallina, Andrea
AU - Tilki, Derya
AU - Shariat, Shahrokh F.
AU - Montorsi, Francesco
AU - Saad, Fred
AU - Briganti, Alberto
AU - Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Harborside Press. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Background: Use of inpatient palliative care (IPC) in the treatment of advanced cancer represents a well-established guideline recommendation. A recent analysis showed that patients with genitourinary cancer benefit from IPC at the second lowest rate among 4 examined primary cancers, namely lung, breast, colorectal, and genitourinary. Based on this observation, temporal trends and predictors of IPC use were examined in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (mUCB) receiving critical care therapies (CCTs). Patients and Methods: Patients with mUCB receiving CCTs were identified within the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database (2004-2015). IPC use rates were evaluated in estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) analyses. Multivariable logistic regression models with adjustment for clustering at the hospital level were used. Results: Of 1,944 patients with mUCB receiving CCTs, 191 (9.8%) received IPC. From2004 through 2015, IPC use increased from 0.7% to 25.0%, respectively (EAPC,123.9%; P <001). In analyses stratified according to regions, the highest increase in IPC use was recorded in the Northeast (EAPC, 144.0%), followed by the West (EAPC, 126.8%), South (EAPC,122.9%), and Midwest (EAPC,115.5%). Moreover, the lowest rate of IPC adoption in 2015 was recorded in the Midwest (14.3%). In multivariable logistic regression models, teaching status (odds ratio [OR], 1.97; P <001), more recent diagnosis (2010-2015; OR, 3.89; P <001), and presence of liver metastases (OR, 1.77; P5.02) were associated with higher IPC rates. Conversely, Hispanic race (OR, 0.42; P5.03) and being hospitalized in the Northeast (OR, 0.36; P5.01) were associated with lower rate of IPC adoption. Finally, patients with a primary admission diagnosis that consisted of infection (OR, 2.05; P5.002), cardiovascular disorders (OR, 2.10; P5.03), or pulmonary disorders (OR, 2.81; P5.005) were more likely to receive IPC. Conclusions: The rate of IPC use in patients with mUCB receiving CCTs sharply increased between 2004 and 2015. The presence of liver metastases, infections, or cardiopulmonary disorders as admission diagnoses represented independent predictors of higher IPC use. Conversely, Hispanic race, nonteaching hospital status, and hospitalization in the Midwest were identified as independent predictors of lower IPC use and represent targets for efforts to improve IPC delivery in patients with mUCB receiving CCT.
AB - Background: Use of inpatient palliative care (IPC) in the treatment of advanced cancer represents a well-established guideline recommendation. A recent analysis showed that patients with genitourinary cancer benefit from IPC at the second lowest rate among 4 examined primary cancers, namely lung, breast, colorectal, and genitourinary. Based on this observation, temporal trends and predictors of IPC use were examined in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (mUCB) receiving critical care therapies (CCTs). Patients and Methods: Patients with mUCB receiving CCTs were identified within the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database (2004-2015). IPC use rates were evaluated in estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) analyses. Multivariable logistic regression models with adjustment for clustering at the hospital level were used. Results: Of 1,944 patients with mUCB receiving CCTs, 191 (9.8%) received IPC. From2004 through 2015, IPC use increased from 0.7% to 25.0%, respectively (EAPC,123.9%; P <001). In analyses stratified according to regions, the highest increase in IPC use was recorded in the Northeast (EAPC, 144.0%), followed by the West (EAPC, 126.8%), South (EAPC,122.9%), and Midwest (EAPC,115.5%). Moreover, the lowest rate of IPC adoption in 2015 was recorded in the Midwest (14.3%). In multivariable logistic regression models, teaching status (odds ratio [OR], 1.97; P <001), more recent diagnosis (2010-2015; OR, 3.89; P <001), and presence of liver metastases (OR, 1.77; P5.02) were associated with higher IPC rates. Conversely, Hispanic race (OR, 0.42; P5.03) and being hospitalized in the Northeast (OR, 0.36; P5.01) were associated with lower rate of IPC adoption. Finally, patients with a primary admission diagnosis that consisted of infection (OR, 2.05; P5.002), cardiovascular disorders (OR, 2.10; P5.03), or pulmonary disorders (OR, 2.81; P5.005) were more likely to receive IPC. Conclusions: The rate of IPC use in patients with mUCB receiving CCTs sharply increased between 2004 and 2015. The presence of liver metastases, infections, or cardiopulmonary disorders as admission diagnoses represented independent predictors of higher IPC use. Conversely, Hispanic race, nonteaching hospital status, and hospitalization in the Midwest were identified as independent predictors of lower IPC use and represent targets for efforts to improve IPC delivery in patients with mUCB receiving CCT.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85074625259
U2 - 10.6004/jnccn.2019.7319
DO - 10.6004/jnccn.2019.7319
M3 - Article
SN - 1540-1405
VL - 17
SP - 1344
EP - 1352
JO - Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN
JF - Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN
IS - 11
ER -