TY - JOUR
T1 - Transtracheal open ventilation in acute respiratory failure secondary to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation
AU - Gregoretti, Cesare
AU - Squadrone, Vincenzo
AU - Fogliati, Claudio
AU - Olivieri, Carlo
AU - Navalesi, Paolo
PY - 2006/4/15
Y1 - 2006/4/15
N2 - Rationale: Patients who fail noninvasive ventilation are generally intubated and are then subjected to complications of invasive mechanical ventilation. With transtracheal open ventilation, ventilator support is delivered through an uncuffed small bore minitracheostomy tube, which eliminates pooling of secretions above the cuff and thus reduces the risk of tracheobronchial microbial colonization. Objective: To compare transtracheal open ventilation (treatment group) with conventional invasive ventilation (control group) in patients with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who initially failed noninvasive ventilation. Methods: Patients were randomized to receive trans-tracheal open ventilation (n = 19) or conventional invasive ventilation (n = 20). Measurements and Main Results: There was no difference in arterial blood gases after 1 and 30 h between the two groups. Two patients receiving transtracheal open ventilation and 13 undergoing conventional ventilation had complications (p < 0.0001). Compared with conventional ventilation, transtracheal open ventilation significantly decreased both the duration of mechanical ventilation (7.6 ± 4.7 vs. 18.6 ± 10.6 d, p < 0.0001) and length of stay in the intensive care unit (10.2 ± 4.5 vs. 21.3 ± 9.7 d, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Transtracheal open ventilation was as effective as conventional ventilation in maintaining adequate gas exchange and reducing complications, duration of mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unit length of stay.
AB - Rationale: Patients who fail noninvasive ventilation are generally intubated and are then subjected to complications of invasive mechanical ventilation. With transtracheal open ventilation, ventilator support is delivered through an uncuffed small bore minitracheostomy tube, which eliminates pooling of secretions above the cuff and thus reduces the risk of tracheobronchial microbial colonization. Objective: To compare transtracheal open ventilation (treatment group) with conventional invasive ventilation (control group) in patients with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who initially failed noninvasive ventilation. Methods: Patients were randomized to receive trans-tracheal open ventilation (n = 19) or conventional invasive ventilation (n = 20). Measurements and Main Results: There was no difference in arterial blood gases after 1 and 30 h between the two groups. Two patients receiving transtracheal open ventilation and 13 undergoing conventional ventilation had complications (p < 0.0001). Compared with conventional ventilation, transtracheal open ventilation significantly decreased both the duration of mechanical ventilation (7.6 ± 4.7 vs. 18.6 ± 10.6 d, p < 0.0001) and length of stay in the intensive care unit (10.2 ± 4.5 vs. 21.3 ± 9.7 d, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Transtracheal open ventilation was as effective as conventional ventilation in maintaining adequate gas exchange and reducing complications, duration of mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unit length of stay.
KW - Acute respiratory failure
KW - Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
KW - Controlled clinical trial
KW - Noninvasive mechanical ventilation
KW - Transtracheal open ventilation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646368914&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1164/rccm.200503-450OC
DO - 10.1164/rccm.200503-450OC
M3 - Article
SN - 1073-449X
VL - 173
SP - 877
EP - 881
JO - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
JF - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
IS - 8
ER -