TY - JOUR
T1 - Third-molar extraction with ultrasound bone surgery
T2 - A case-control study
AU - Mozzati, Marco
AU - Gallesio, Giorgia
AU - Russo, Andrea
AU - Staiti, Giorgio
AU - Mortellaro, Carmen
PY - 2014/5
Y1 - 2014/5
N2 - PURPOSE: The aim of this case-control study was to evaluate the postoperative period and healing between 2 surgical methods (traditional and ultrasound bone surgery) that are used for mandibular third-molar extraction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with impaction of both of the lower third molars and indications for their extractions were used in this study. Bilateral-mandibular third-molar extractions were performed at the same surgical time: traditional surgery with burrs was used on 1 side (control site), and ultrasound surgery was used on the other side (test [T] site). After surgery, the patients were examined at 7 and 14 days and at 1 and 3 months to evaluate tissue healing. The following was assessed at every follow-up: pain, trismus, swelling, and alveolar bone level. RESULTS: The study included 15 patients, and 30 mandibular third-molar extractions were performed. We found only 1 postoperative complication: 1 patient had alveolitis in the control site. Complete recoveries without any complications were reported in all of the patients at the T sites. CONCLUSIONS: Complete recoveries without any complication were reported in all patients at the T sites. The only disadvantage of the piezoelectric technique was the length of operation time, which was increased by approximately 8 minutes; however, this effect was offset by reducing the morbidity. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our preliminary study showed that Piezosurgery is an excellent tool for reducing the risk of complications and improving the postoperative period.
AB - PURPOSE: The aim of this case-control study was to evaluate the postoperative period and healing between 2 surgical methods (traditional and ultrasound bone surgery) that are used for mandibular third-molar extraction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with impaction of both of the lower third molars and indications for their extractions were used in this study. Bilateral-mandibular third-molar extractions were performed at the same surgical time: traditional surgery with burrs was used on 1 side (control site), and ultrasound surgery was used on the other side (test [T] site). After surgery, the patients were examined at 7 and 14 days and at 1 and 3 months to evaluate tissue healing. The following was assessed at every follow-up: pain, trismus, swelling, and alveolar bone level. RESULTS: The study included 15 patients, and 30 mandibular third-molar extractions were performed. We found only 1 postoperative complication: 1 patient had alveolitis in the control site. Complete recoveries without any complications were reported in all of the patients at the T sites. CONCLUSIONS: Complete recoveries without any complication were reported in all patients at the T sites. The only disadvantage of the piezoelectric technique was the length of operation time, which was increased by approximately 8 minutes; however, this effect was offset by reducing the morbidity. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our preliminary study showed that Piezosurgery is an excellent tool for reducing the risk of complications and improving the postoperative period.
KW - Bilateral-mandibular third-molar extractions
KW - Intraoperative visibility
KW - Low-speed rotary instruments
KW - Odontotomy
KW - Osteotomy
KW - Piezosurgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84900854301&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000825
DO - 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000825
M3 - Article
SN - 1049-2275
VL - 25
SP - 856
EP - 859
JO - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
JF - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
IS - 3
ER -