Salta alla navigazione principale Salta alla ricerca Salta al contenuto principale

The PASEO (PaclitAxel or Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Bare Metal Stent in Primary Angioplasty) Randomized Trial

  • Emilio Di Lorenzo
  • , Giuseppe De Luca
  • , Rosario Sauro
  • , Attilio Varricchio
  • , Michele Capasso
  • , Tonino Lanzillo
  • , Fiore Manganelli
  • , Ciro Mariello
  • , Francesco Siano
  • , Maria Rosaria Pagliuca
  • , Giovanni Stanco
  • , Giuseppe Rosato

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo su rivistaArticolo in rivistapeer review

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefits of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) as compared with bare-metal stents (BMS) in patients undergoing primary angioplasty. Background: Recent concerns have emerged on the potential higher risk of stent thrombosis after drug-eluting stent implantation, especially among ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. Methods: We randomly assigned STEMI patients admitted within 12 h of symptom onset undergoing primary angioplasty and stent implantation to BMS, PES, or SES. The primary study end point was target lesion revascularization at 1-year follow-up. All patients were reviewed at our outpatient clinic or by telephone interview at 6, 12, and 24 months. Results: From October 2003 to December 2005, 270 STEMI patients undergoing primary angioplasty were randomized to BMS (n = 90), PES (n = 90), or SES (n = 90). No patient was lost to follow-up. As compared with BMS (14.4%), both PES (4.4%, p = 0.023) and SES (3.3%, p = 0.016) were associated with a significant reduction in target lesion revascularization at 1-year follow-up. At 2-year follow-up no difference was observed in terms of death, reinfarction, and combined death and/or reinfarction, but as compared with BMS, both PES and SES were associated with significant benefits in major adverse cardiac events (PES: 16.7%, p = 0.015; SES: 15.6%, p = 0.009, respectively). Conclusions: This study shows that among STEMI patients undergoing primary angioplasty, both SES and PES are safe and associated with significant benefits in terms of target lesion revascularization up to the 2-year follow-up. Thus, until the results of further large randomized trials with long-term follow-up become available, drug-eluting stents may be considered for STEMI patients undergoing primary angioplasty. (PaclitAxel or Sirolimus-Eluting Stent versus Bare Metal Stent in Primary Angioplasty [PASEO] Randomized Trial; NCT00759850).

Lingua originaleInglese
pagine (da-a)515-523
Numero di pagine9
RivistaJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume2
Numero di pubblicazione6
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - giu 2009
Pubblicato esternamente

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'The PASEO (PaclitAxel or Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Bare Metal Stent in Primary Angioplasty) Randomized Trial'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo