TY - JOUR
T1 - The effectiveness of a school-based substance abuse prevention program
T2 - EU-Dap cluster randomised controlled trial
AU - The EU-Dap Study Group
AU - Faggiano, Fabrizio
AU - Galanti, Maria Rosaria
AU - Bohrn, Karl
AU - Burkhart, Gregor
AU - Vigna-Taglianti, Federica
AU - Cuomo, Luca
AU - Fabiani, Leila
AU - Panella, Massimiliano
AU - Perez, Tatiana
AU - Siliquini, Roberta
AU - Van Der Kreeft, Peer
AU - Vassara, Maro
AU - Wiborg, Gudrun
AU - Zunino, Barbara
AU - Siliquini, Valeria
AU - Vitale, Laura
AU - Coppens, Erwin
AU - Melero, Juan Carlos
AU - Varona, Laura
AU - Yotsidi, Vicky
AU - Richardson, Clive
AU - Lindahl, Ann Marie
AU - Scatigna, Maria
N1 - Funding Information:
EU-Dap is a project funded by the European Commission (European Public Health program 2002 grant # SPC 2002376). Additional national funding was provided by: Compagnia di San Paolo (grant # 2002-0703) and Lega Italiana per la Lotta contro i Tumori (grant # 2003 43/4) for the Novara centre, Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research (grant # 2002-0979) and Stockholm County Council (Public Health grant # LS 0401-0117) for the Swedish centre.
PY - 2008/11
Y1 - 2008/11
N2 - Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of the school-based drug abuse prevention program developed in the EU-Dap study (EUropean Drug Abuse Prevention trial) in preventing the use of tobacco, alcohol and drugs at the post-test. Methods: Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial. Seven European countries participated in the study; 170 schools (7079 pupils 12-14 years of age) were randomly assigned to one of three experimental conditions or to a control condition during the school year 2004/2005. A pre-test survey assessing past and current substance use was conducted before the implementation of the program. The program consisted in 12-hour class-based curriculum based on a comprehensive social-influence approach. A post-test survey was carried out in all participating schools, 3 months after the end of the program. The association between program condition and change in substance use at post-test was expressed as adjusted Prevalence Odds Ratio (POR), estimated by multilevel regression model. Results: Program effects were found for daily cigarette smoking (POR = 0.70; 0.52-0.94) and episodes of drunkenness in the past 30 days (POR = 0.72; 0.58-0.90 for at least one episode, POR = 0.69; 0.48-0.99 for three or more episodes), while effects on Cannabis use in the past 30 days were of marginal statistical significance (POR = 0.77; 0.60-1.00). The curriculum was successful in preventing baseline non-smokers or sporadic smokers from moving onto daily smoking, but it was not effective in helping baseline daily smokers to reduce or stop smoking. Conclusion: School curricula based on a comprehensive social-influence model may delay progression to daily smoking and episodes of drunkenness.
AB - Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of the school-based drug abuse prevention program developed in the EU-Dap study (EUropean Drug Abuse Prevention trial) in preventing the use of tobacco, alcohol and drugs at the post-test. Methods: Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial. Seven European countries participated in the study; 170 schools (7079 pupils 12-14 years of age) were randomly assigned to one of three experimental conditions or to a control condition during the school year 2004/2005. A pre-test survey assessing past and current substance use was conducted before the implementation of the program. The program consisted in 12-hour class-based curriculum based on a comprehensive social-influence approach. A post-test survey was carried out in all participating schools, 3 months after the end of the program. The association between program condition and change in substance use at post-test was expressed as adjusted Prevalence Odds Ratio (POR), estimated by multilevel regression model. Results: Program effects were found for daily cigarette smoking (POR = 0.70; 0.52-0.94) and episodes of drunkenness in the past 30 days (POR = 0.72; 0.58-0.90 for at least one episode, POR = 0.69; 0.48-0.99 for three or more episodes), while effects on Cannabis use in the past 30 days were of marginal statistical significance (POR = 0.77; 0.60-1.00). The curriculum was successful in preventing baseline non-smokers or sporadic smokers from moving onto daily smoking, but it was not effective in helping baseline daily smokers to reduce or stop smoking. Conclusion: School curricula based on a comprehensive social-influence model may delay progression to daily smoking and episodes of drunkenness.
KW - Alcohol drinking
KW - Cannabis
KW - Cluster randomised controlled trial
KW - Comprehensive social-influence model
KW - School-based prevention
KW - Substance use
KW - Tobacco
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/55049092689
U2 - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.06.018
DO - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.06.018
M3 - Article
SN - 0091-7435
VL - 47
SP - 537
EP - 543
JO - Preventive Medicine
JF - Preventive Medicine
IS - 5
ER -