The Costs of Digital Health Interventions to Improve Immunization Data in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Multicountry Mixed Methods Study

  • Carlo Federici
  • , Maria Verykiou
  • , Marianna Cavazza
  • , Willyhelmina Olomi
  • , Piero Irakiza
  • , Kizito Kayumba
  • , Edith Rodriguez
  • , Luis Enrique Castillo Mendoza
  • , Stefano Malvolti
  • , Claire Hugo
  • , Nyanda Elias Ntinginya
  • , Souleymane Camara
  • , Issa Sabi
  • , Nagnouma Sano
  • , Hassan Sibomana
  • , Jeanine Condo
  • , Aleksandra Torbica
  • , Claudio Jommi
  • , Carsten Mantel
  • , Viviana Mangiaterra

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo su rivistaArticolo in rivistapeer review

Abstract

Background: Digital health interventions, such as electronic immunization registries (eIRs) and electronic logistic management information systems (eLMIS), have the potential to significantly improve immunization data management and vaccine logistics in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite their growing adoption, there is limited evidence of the financial and economic costs associated with their implementation compared to traditional paper-based systems. Objectives: We aimed to measure the costs of implementing eIR and eLMIS systems in LMICs and to estimate their economic costs as compared to the previous paper-based registries. Methods: The study was conducted across four countries—Guinea, Honduras, Rwanda, and Tanzania—which implemented the tools in 2018, 2012, 2019, and 2014, respectively. A combination of primary and secondary data sources was used for the analysis. Retrospective cost data regarding the design, development, and implementation of the tools were directly obtained from implementers and National Immunization Program offices in all countries. Primary survey data were collected to gauge the operational expenses of immunization information systems, both with and without electronic tools, using an activity-based costing approach in 275 facilities. The annual cost of the immunization information system at the national level was then extrapolated and compared to national spending on immunization as a measure of affordability. Costs were reported in 2023 international dollars (I$) Results: The total costs of designing, developing, and deploying eIR, eLMIS, or both were I$ 2.2, 6.4, 6.8, and 44.3 million in Guinea, Honduras, Rwanda, and Tanzania, respectively. Design costs were greatly affected by the degree of customization of the tool, whereas rollout costs were mostly driven by the costs of purchasing hardware and training health workers. Overall, the implementation of the electronic systems was associated with higher costs in Honduras (I$626 per facility, 95% CI 516-821) and Rwanda (I$399, 95% CI I$108-I$691), a cost reduction in Tanzania (−I$2539, 95% CI −I$4290 to −I$789) and no significant cost difference in Guinea. The percentage weight of the cost of managing data with the electronic systems over the total national immunization budgets was estimated at 0.7%, 7.7%, 3.3%, and 4.8% for Guinea, Honduras, Rwanda, and Tanzania, respectively. Conclusions: Digital health interventions such as eIR and eLMIS can potentially reduce costs and improve the efficiency of immunization data management and vaccine logistics in LMICs. However, the extent of cost savings depends on how effectively these digital systems replace traditional paper-based methods and the extent of their use in decision-making, especially at the facility level. Careful planning and investment are essential to unlocking the full economic potential of digital health in LMICs.

Lingua originaleInglese
Numero di articoloe62746
RivistaJournal of Medical Internet Research
Volume27
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2025
Pubblicato esternamente

OSS delle Nazioni Unite

Questo processo contribuisce al raggiungimento dei seguenti obiettivi di sviluppo sostenibile

  1. SDG 3 - Salute e benessere
    SDG 3 Salute e benessere

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'The Costs of Digital Health Interventions to Improve Immunization Data in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Multicountry Mixed Methods Study'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo