TY - JOUR
T1 - Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SShl) diagnostic delay during COViD-19 pandemic: a single-center retrospective study
AU - Campagnoli, M.
AU - Cerasuolo, M.
AU - Arena, G.
AU - Toso, A.
AU - Borello, G.
AU - GARZARO, Massimiliano
AU - ALUFFI VALLETTI, Paolo
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - BaCKgrOUND: the COViD-19 pandemic caused a diagnostic delay in various conditions, including sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SShl). the aim of this study was to investigate whether during the COViD-19 emergency period patients with a diagnosis of SShl received a late diagnosis and if any delay resulted in a worse post-therapy outcome. MEthODS: a retrospective study was conducted. Patients who received a diagnosis of SShl during COViD-19 period and in the same period of the previous year were identified (control group); demographic and clinical data, values of the tonal threshold at the time of diagnosis (T0) and after therapy (t1) and the recovery rate were collected. rESUltS: Sixteen patients of group 1 (control group) and 11 of group 2 (COViD-19 period) met the inclusion criteria. Diagnosis and therapy were performed on average after 1.69 days in group 1, after 5.45 days from the onset of symptoms in group 2 (P=0.0025). after therapy, the audiometric control examination showed an average threshold recovery of 26.77 dB in group 1 and 20.53 dB in group 2 (P=0.048). in group 1, 62.5% experienced recovery of the hearing threshold while in group 2 only 36.4% (P=0.252). CONClUSiONS: Despite therapy starting time was inevitably different in analyzed groups, diagnostic delay during COViD-19 emergency period resulted in a reduced improvement in the mean tonal threshold after therapy. Our data seems to confirm the hypothesis that early diagnosis and treatment are associated with a higher probability of auditory recovery.
AB - BaCKgrOUND: the COViD-19 pandemic caused a diagnostic delay in various conditions, including sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SShl). the aim of this study was to investigate whether during the COViD-19 emergency period patients with a diagnosis of SShl received a late diagnosis and if any delay resulted in a worse post-therapy outcome. MEthODS: a retrospective study was conducted. Patients who received a diagnosis of SShl during COViD-19 period and in the same period of the previous year were identified (control group); demographic and clinical data, values of the tonal threshold at the time of diagnosis (T0) and after therapy (t1) and the recovery rate were collected. rESUltS: Sixteen patients of group 1 (control group) and 11 of group 2 (COViD-19 period) met the inclusion criteria. Diagnosis and therapy were performed on average after 1.69 days in group 1, after 5.45 days from the onset of symptoms in group 2 (P=0.0025). after therapy, the audiometric control examination showed an average threshold recovery of 26.77 dB in group 1 and 20.53 dB in group 2 (P=0.048). in group 1, 62.5% experienced recovery of the hearing threshold while in group 2 only 36.4% (P=0.252). CONClUSiONS: Despite therapy starting time was inevitably different in analyzed groups, diagnostic delay during COViD-19 emergency period resulted in a reduced improvement in the mean tonal threshold after therapy. Our data seems to confirm the hypothesis that early diagnosis and treatment are associated with a higher probability of auditory recovery.
KW - COVID-19
KW - Diagnosis
KW - Hearing loss, sensorineural
KW - Quality of life
KW - COVID-19
KW - Diagnosis
KW - Hearing loss, sensorineural
KW - Quality of life
UR - https://iris.uniupo.it/handle/11579/198111
U2 - 10.23736/S2724-6302.20.02328-0
DO - 10.23736/S2724-6302.20.02328-0
M3 - Article
SN - 2724-6302
VL - 71
SP - 91
EP - 94
JO - OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
JF - OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
IS - 2
ER -