Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy as an Alternative Treatment for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Compared to Sorafenib: A Propensity Score Analysis

Dominik Bettinger, David J. Pinato, Michael Schultheiss, Rohini Sharma, Lorenza Rimassa, Tiziana Pressiani, Michela E. Burlone, Mario Pirisi, Masatoshi Kudo, Joong Won Park, Nico Buettner, Christoph Neumann-Haefelin, Tobias Boettler, Nasrin Abbasi-Senger, Horst Alheit, Wolfgang Baus, Oliver Blanck, Sabine Gerum, Mathias Guckenberger, Daniel HabermehlChristian Ostheimer, Oliver Riesterer, Jörg Tamihardja, Anca Ligia Grosu, Robert Thimme, Thomas Baptist Brunner, Eleni Gkika

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo su rivistaArticolo in rivistapeer review

Abstract

Background and Aims: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a safe and effective treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but its role in patients with advanced HCC is not yet defined. In this study, we aim to assess the efficacy and safety of SBRT in comparison to sorafenib treatment in patients with advanced HCC. Methods: We included 901 patients treated with sorafenib at six tertiary centers in Europe and Asia and 122 patients treated with SBRT from 13 centers in Germany and Switzerland. Medical records were reviewed including laboratory parameters, treatment characteristics and development of adverse events. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival. Results: Median OS of SBRT patients was 18.1 (10.3-25.9) months compared to 8.8 (8.2-9.5) in sorafenib patients. After adjusting for different baseline characteristics, the survival benefit for patients treated with SBRT was still preserved with a median OS of 17.0 (10.8-23.2) months compared to 9.6 (8.6-10.7) months in sorafenib patients. SBRT treatment of intrahepatic lesions in patients with extrahepatic metastases was also associated with improved OS compared to patients treated with sorafenib in the same setting (17.0 vs. 10.0 months, p = 0.012), whereas in patients with portal vein thrombosis there was no survival benefit in patients with SBRT. Conclusions: In this retrospective comparative study, SBRT showed superior efficacy in HCC patients compared to patients treated with sorafenib.

Lingua originaleInglese
pagine (da-a)281-294
Numero di pagine14
RivistaLiver Cancer
Volume8
Numero di pubblicazione4
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 1 lug 2019

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy as an Alternative Treatment for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Compared to Sorafenib: A Propensity Score Analysis'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo