TY - JOUR
T1 - Sigh maneuver to enhance assessment of fluid responsiveness during pressure support ventilation
AU - Messina, Antonio
AU - Colombo, Davide
AU - Barra, Federico Lorenzo
AU - Cammarota, Gianmaria
AU - De Mattei, Giacomo
AU - Longhini, Federico
AU - Romagnoli, Stefano
AU - Dellacorte, Francesco
AU - De Backer, Daniel
AU - Cecconi, Maurizio
AU - Navalesi, Paolo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Author(s).
PY - 2019/1/28
Y1 - 2019/1/28
N2 - Background: Assessment of fluid responsiveness is problematic in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, in particular for those undergoing modes of partial support, such as pressure support ventilation (PSV). We propose a new test, based on application of a ventilator-generated sigh, to predict fluid responsiveness in ICU patients undergoing PSV. Methods: This was a prospective bi-centric interventional study conducted in two general ICUs. In 40 critically ill patients with a stable ventilatory PSV pattern and requiring volume expansion (VE), we assessed the variations in arterial systolic pressure (SAP), pulse pressure (PP) and stroke volume index (SVI) consequent to random application of 4-s sighs at three different inspiratory pressures. A radial arterial signal was directed to the MOSTCARE™ pulse contour hemodynamic monitoring system for hemodynamic measurements. Data obtained during sigh tests were recorded beat by beat, while all the hemodynamic parameters were averaged over 30 s for the remaining period of the study protocol. VE consisted of 500 mL of crystalloids over 10 min. A patient was considered a responder if a VE-induced increase in cardiac index (CI) ≥ 15% was observed. Results: The slopes for SAP, SVI and PP of were all significantly different between responders and non-responders (p < 0.0001, p = 0.0004 and p < 0.0001, respectively). The AUC of the slope of SAP (0.99; sensitivity 100.0% (79.4-100.0%) and specificity 95.8% (78.8-99.9%) was significantly greater than the AUC for PP (0.91) and SVI (0.83) (p = 0.04 and 0.009, respectively). The SAP slope best threshold value of the ROC curve was - 4.4° from baseline. The only parameter found to be independently associated with fluid responsiveness among those included in the logistic regression was the slope for SAP (p = 0.009; odds ratio 0.27 (95% confidence interval (CI 95 ) 0.10-0.70)). The effects produced by the sigh at 35 cmH 2 0 (Sigh 35 ) are significantly different between responders and non-responders. For a 35% reduction in PP from baseline, the AUC was 0.91 (CI 95 0.82-0.99), with sensitivity 75.0% and specificity 91.6%. Conclusions: In a selected ICU population undergoing PSV, analysis of the slope for SAP after the application of three successive sighs and the nadir of PP after Sigh 35 reliably predict fluid responsiveness. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12615001232527. Registered on 10 November 2015.
AB - Background: Assessment of fluid responsiveness is problematic in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, in particular for those undergoing modes of partial support, such as pressure support ventilation (PSV). We propose a new test, based on application of a ventilator-generated sigh, to predict fluid responsiveness in ICU patients undergoing PSV. Methods: This was a prospective bi-centric interventional study conducted in two general ICUs. In 40 critically ill patients with a stable ventilatory PSV pattern and requiring volume expansion (VE), we assessed the variations in arterial systolic pressure (SAP), pulse pressure (PP) and stroke volume index (SVI) consequent to random application of 4-s sighs at three different inspiratory pressures. A radial arterial signal was directed to the MOSTCARE™ pulse contour hemodynamic monitoring system for hemodynamic measurements. Data obtained during sigh tests were recorded beat by beat, while all the hemodynamic parameters were averaged over 30 s for the remaining period of the study protocol. VE consisted of 500 mL of crystalloids over 10 min. A patient was considered a responder if a VE-induced increase in cardiac index (CI) ≥ 15% was observed. Results: The slopes for SAP, SVI and PP of were all significantly different between responders and non-responders (p < 0.0001, p = 0.0004 and p < 0.0001, respectively). The AUC of the slope of SAP (0.99; sensitivity 100.0% (79.4-100.0%) and specificity 95.8% (78.8-99.9%) was significantly greater than the AUC for PP (0.91) and SVI (0.83) (p = 0.04 and 0.009, respectively). The SAP slope best threshold value of the ROC curve was - 4.4° from baseline. The only parameter found to be independently associated with fluid responsiveness among those included in the logistic regression was the slope for SAP (p = 0.009; odds ratio 0.27 (95% confidence interval (CI 95 ) 0.10-0.70)). The effects produced by the sigh at 35 cmH 2 0 (Sigh 35 ) are significantly different between responders and non-responders. For a 35% reduction in PP from baseline, the AUC was 0.91 (CI 95 0.82-0.99), with sensitivity 75.0% and specificity 91.6%. Conclusions: In a selected ICU population undergoing PSV, analysis of the slope for SAP after the application of three successive sighs and the nadir of PP after Sigh 35 reliably predict fluid responsiveness. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12615001232527. Registered on 10 November 2015.
KW - Fluid responsiveness
KW - Functional hemodynamic assessment
KW - Pressure support ventilation
KW - Sigh maneuver
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85060565280
U2 - 10.1186/s13054-018-2294-4
DO - 10.1186/s13054-018-2294-4
M3 - Article
SN - 1364-8535
VL - 23
JO - Critical Care
JF - Critical Care
IS - 1
M1 - 31
ER -