Abstract
If political fake news is a serious concern for democratic politics, no less
worrisome is scientific news with patently distorted content. Prima facie,
scientific misinformation partially escapes the definition of fake news
provided by empirical and philosophical analysis, mainly patterned after
political disinformation. Most notably, we aim to show that people are
often unaware not only of disseminating, but also of producing false or
misleading information. However, by leveraging the philosophical and
psychological literature, we advance some reasons for keeping scientific
misinformation under the same umbrella, broadening the definition of
fake news in order to account for it as well. In concluding, we shall
advance some ideas on how to reform scientific communication, which
may help to address the issue of scientific misinformation.
| Lingua originale | Inglese |
|---|---|
| pagine (da-a) | 703-718 |
| Numero di pagine | 16 |
| Rivista | Social Epistemology |
| DOI | |
| Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2022 |
OSS delle Nazioni Unite
Questo processo contribuisce al raggiungimento dei seguenti obiettivi di sviluppo sostenibile
-
SDG 4 Istruzione di qualità
Keywords
- Fake news
- motivated reasoning
- scientific misinformation
- self-deception
Fingerprint
Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Scientific Misinformation and Fake News: A Blurred Boundary'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.Cita questo
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver