Real-world candidacy to mavacamten in a contemporary hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy population

Edoardo Bertero, Chiara Chiti, Maria Alessandra Schiavo, Giacomo Tini, Paolo Costa, Giancarlo Todiere, Barbara Mabritto, Lorenzo Lupo Dei, Alessia Giannattasio, Davide Mariani, Carla Lofiego, Caterina Santolamazza, Emanuele Monda, Giovanni Quarta, Davide Barbisan, Giulia Elena Mandoli, Massimo Mapelli, Maurizio Sguazzotti, Francesco Negri, Simona De VecchiMichele Ciabatti, Daniela Tomasoni, Andrea Mazzanti, Francesca Marzo, Cesare de Gregorio, Claudia Raineri, Pier Filippo Vianello, Alberto Marchi, Giulia Biagioni, Eleonora Insinna, Vanda Parisi, Raffaello Ditaranto, Andrea Barison, Andrea Giammarresi, Gaetano Maria De Ferrari, Silvia Priori, Marco Metra, Maurizio Pieroni, Giuseppe Patti, Massimo Imazio, Enrica Perugini, Piergiuseppe Agostoni, Matteo Cameli, Marco Merlo, Gianfranco Sinagra, Michele Senni, Giuseppe Limongelli, Enrico Ammirati, Fabio Vagnarelli, Lia Crotti, Luigi Badano, Chiara Calore, Domenico Gabrielli, Federica Re, Giuseppe Musumeci, Michele Emdin, Emanuele Barbato, Beatrice Musumeci, Camillo Autore, Elena Biagini, Italo Porto, Iacopo Olivotto, Marco Canepa

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo su rivistaArticolo in rivistapeer review

Abstract

Aims: In the EXPLORER-HCM trial, mavacamten reduced left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) and improved functional capacity of symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) patients. We sought to define the potential use of mavacamten by comparing real-world HOCM patients with those enrolled in EXPLORER-HCM and assessing their eligibility to treatment. Methods and results: We collected information on HOCM patients followed up at 25 Italian HCM outpatient clinics and with significant LVOTO (i.e. gradient ≥30 mmHg at rest or ≥50 mmHg after Valsalva manoeuvre or exercise) despite pharmacological or non-pharmacological therapy. Pharmacological or non-pharmacological therapy resolved LVOTO in 1044 (61.2%) of the 1706 HOCM patients under active follow-up, whereas 662 patients (38.8%) had persistent LVOTO. Compared to the EXPLORER-HCM trial population, these real-world HOCM patients were older (62.1 ± 14.3 vs. 58.5 ± 12.2 years, p = 0.02), had a lower body mass index (26.8 ± 5.3 vs. 29.7 ± 4.9 kg/m2, p < 0.0001) and a more frequent history of atrial fibrillation (21.5% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.027). At echocardiography, they had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, 66 ± 7% vs. 74 ± 6%, p < 0.0001), higher left ventricular outflow tract gradients at rest (60 ± 27 vs. 52 ± 29 mmHg, p = 0.003), and larger left atrial volume index (49 ± 16 vs. 40 ± 12 ml/m2, p < 0.0001). Overall, 324 (48.9%) would have been eligible for enrolment in the EXPLORER-HCM trial and 339 (51.2%) for treatment with mavacamten according to European guidelines. Conclusions: Real-world HOCM patients differ from the EXPLORER-HCM population for their older age, lower LVEF and larger atrial volume, potentially reflecting a more advanced stage of the disease. About half of real-world HOCM patients were found eligible to mavacamten.

Lingua originaleInglese
pagine (da-a)59-64
Numero di pagine6
RivistaEuropean Journal of Heart Failure
Volume26
Numero di pubblicazione1
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - gen 2024
Pubblicato esternamente

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Real-world candidacy to mavacamten in a contemporary hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy population'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo