Salta alla navigazione principale Salta alla ricerca Salta al contenuto principale

Re-irradiation for recurrent glioma: outcome evaluation, toxicity and prognostic factors assessment. A multicenter study of the Radiation Oncology Italian Association (AIRO)

  • Pierina Navarria
  • , Giuseppe Minniti
  • , Elena Clerici
  • , Stefano Tomatis
  • , Valentina Pinzi
  • , Patrizia Ciammella
  • , Marco Galaverni
  • , Dante Amelio
  • , Daniele Scartoni
  • , Silvia Scoccianti
  • , Marco Krengli
  • , Laura Masini
  • , Lorena Draghini
  • , Ernesto Maranzano
  • , Valentina Borzillo
  • , Paolo Muto
  • , Fabio Ferrarese
  • , Laura Fariselli
  • , Lorenzo Livi
  • , Francesco Pasqualetti
  • Alba Fiorentino, Filippo Alongi, Michela Buglione di Monale, Stefano Magrini, Marta Scorsetti

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo su rivistaArticolo in rivistapeer review

Abstract

Introduction: The prognosis of glioma is dismal, and almost all patients relapsed. At recurrence time, several treatment options are considered, but to date there is no a standard of care. The Neurooncology Study Group of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology (AIRO) collected clinical data regarding a large series of recurrent glioma patients who underwent re-irradiation (re-RT) in Italy. Methods: Data regarding 300 recurrent glioma patients treated from May 2002 to November 2017, were analyzed. All patients underwent re-RT. Surgical resection, followed by re-RT with concomitant and adjuvant chemotherapy was performed. Clinical outcome was evaluated by neurological examination and brain MRI performed, 1 month after radiation therapy and then every 3 months. Results: Re-irradiation was performed at a median interval time (IT) of 16 months from the first RT. Surgical resection before re-RT was performed in 19% of patients, concomitant temozolomide (TMZ) in 16.3%, and maintenance chemotherapy in 29%. Total doses ranged from 9 Gy to 52.5 Gy, with a median biological effective dose of 43 Gy. The median, 1, 2 year OS were 9.7 months, 41% and 17.7%. Low grade glioma histology (p ≪ 0.01), IT > 12 months (p = 0.001), KPS > 70 (p = 0.004), younger age (p = 0.001), high total doses delivered (p = 0.04), and combined treatment performed (p = 0.0008) were recorded as conditioning survival. Conclusion: our data underline re-RT as a safe and feasible treatment with limited rate of toxicity, and a combined ones as a better option for selected patients. The identification of a BED threshold able to obtain a greater benefit on OS, can help in designing future prospective studies.

Lingua originaleInglese
pagine (da-a)59-67
Numero di pagine9
RivistaJournal of Neuro-Oncology
Volume142
Numero di pubblicazione1
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 15 mar 2019

OSS delle Nazioni Unite

Questo processo contribuisce al raggiungimento dei seguenti obiettivi di sviluppo sostenibile

  1. SDG 3 - Salute e benessere
    SDG 3 Salute e benessere

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Re-irradiation for recurrent glioma: outcome evaluation, toxicity and prognostic factors assessment. A multicenter study of the Radiation Oncology Italian Association (AIRO)'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo