TY - JOUR
T1 - Randomized trial of two schedules of low-dose gemtuzumab ozogamicin as induction monotherapy for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia in older patients not considered candidates for intensive chemotherapy. A phase II study of the EORTC and GIMEMA leukaemia groups (AML-19)
AU - Amadori, Sergio
AU - Suciu, Stefan
AU - Selleslag, Dominik
AU - Stasi, Roberto
AU - Alimena, Giuliana
AU - Baila, Liliana
AU - Rizzoli, Vittorio
AU - Borlenghi, Erika
AU - Gaidano, Gianluca
AU - Magro, Domenico
AU - Torelli, Giuseppe
AU - Muus, Petra
AU - Venditti, Adriano
AU - Cacciola, Emma
AU - Lauria, Francesco
AU - Vignetti, Marco
AU - De Witte, Theo
PY - 2010/5
Y1 - 2010/5
N2 - This study compared two schedules of low-dose gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) as induction monotherapy for untreated acute myeloid leukaemia in older patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy, to identify the more promising regimen for further study. Patients were randomized to receive either best supportive care or a course of GO according to one of two schedules: 3 mg/m2 on days 1, 3 and 5 (arm A), or GO 6 mg/m2 on day 1 and 3 mg/m2 on day 8 (arm B). Primary endpoint was the rate of disease non-progression (DnP), defined as the proportion of patients either achieving a response or maintaining a stable disease following GO induction in each arm. Fifty-six patients were randomized in the two GO arms (A, n = 29; B, n = 27). The rate of DnP was 38% [90% confidence interval (CI), 23-55] in arm A, and 63% (90% CI, 45-78) in arm B. Peripheral cytopenias were the most common adverse events for both regimens. The all-cause early mortality rate was 14% in arm A and 11% in arm B. The day 1 + 8 schedule, which was associated with the highest rate of DnP, met the statistical criteria to be selected as the preferred regimen for phase III comparison with best supportive care.
AB - This study compared two schedules of low-dose gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) as induction monotherapy for untreated acute myeloid leukaemia in older patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy, to identify the more promising regimen for further study. Patients were randomized to receive either best supportive care or a course of GO according to one of two schedules: 3 mg/m2 on days 1, 3 and 5 (arm A), or GO 6 mg/m2 on day 1 and 3 mg/m2 on day 8 (arm B). Primary endpoint was the rate of disease non-progression (DnP), defined as the proportion of patients either achieving a response or maintaining a stable disease following GO induction in each arm. Fifty-six patients were randomized in the two GO arms (A, n = 29; B, n = 27). The rate of DnP was 38% [90% confidence interval (CI), 23-55] in arm A, and 63% (90% CI, 45-78) in arm B. Peripheral cytopenias were the most common adverse events for both regimens. The all-cause early mortality rate was 14% in arm A and 11% in arm B. The day 1 + 8 schedule, which was associated with the highest rate of DnP, met the statistical criteria to be selected as the preferred regimen for phase III comparison with best supportive care.
KW - Acute myeloid leukaemia
KW - Elderly
KW - Gemtuzumab ozogamicin
KW - Supportive care
KW - Targeted therapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950796567&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08095.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08095.x
M3 - Article
SN - 0007-1048
VL - 149
SP - 376
EP - 382
JO - British Journal of Haematology
JF - British Journal of Haematology
IS - 3
ER -