TY - JOUR
T1 - Radiation dose from medical imaging in end stage renal disease patients
T2 - a Nationwide Italian Survey
AU - On behalf of the MIRA-ESRD Study Investigators
AU - Postorino, Maurizio
AU - Lizio, Domenico
AU - De Mauri, Andreana
AU - Marino, Carmela
AU - Tripepi, Giovanni Luigi
AU - Zoccali, Carmine
AU - Brambilla, Marco
AU - Balestra, Emilio
AU - Bellino, Diego
AU - Benevento, Roberta
AU - Bregant, Cristina
AU - Bregant, Paola
AU - Cannillo, Barbara
AU - Casto, Giuseppe
AU - Chiarinotti, Doriana
AU - Cimolai, Sara
AU - Colussi, Giacomo
AU - De Agostini, Antonio
AU - Declich, Fausto
AU - Facchini, Maria Grazia
AU - Galione, Maria Alessandra
AU - Gavotti, Cesare
AU - Gerini, Ugo
AU - Isoardi, Paola
AU - Izzo, Cristina
AU - Levrero, Fabrizio
AU - Lorenzon, Eric
AU - Maffei, Stefano
AU - Maggi, Stefania
AU - Mari, Alberto
AU - Mattana, Federico
AU - Menegotto, Alberto
AU - Meniconi, Ophelia
AU - Paruccini, Nicoletta
AU - Pierotti, Luisa
AU - Pieruzzi, Federico
AU - Pontoriero, Giuseppe
AU - Postorino, Adele
AU - Quaglia, Marco
AU - Rampado, Osvaldo
AU - Ranghino, Andrea
AU - Reccanello, Sonia
AU - Sabatino, Stefania
AU - Sangalli, Giulia
AU - Sottocornola, Chiara
AU - Sutto, Marina
AU - Tata, Salvatore
AU - Torresin, Alberto
AU - Traino, Antonio
AU - Trianni, Annalisa
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Italian Society of Nephrology.
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Background and objectives: End stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are exposed to the risk of ionizing radiation during repeated imaging studies. The variability in diagnostic imaging policies and the accompanying radiation doses across various renal units is still unknown. We studied this variability at the centre level and quantified the associated radiation doses at the patient level. Methods: Fourteen Italian nephrology departments enrolled 739 patients on haemodialysis and 486 kidney transplant patients. The details of the radiological procedures performed over one year were recorded. The effective doses and organ doses of radiation were estimated for each patient using standardized methods to convert exposure parameters into effective and organ doses Results: Computed tomography (CT) was the major contributor (> 77%) to ionizing radiation exposure. Among the haemodialysis and kidney transplant patients, 15% and 6% were in the high (≥ 20 mSv per year) radiation dose groups, respectively. In haemodialysis patients, the most exposed organs were the liver (16 mSv), the kidney (15 mSv) and the stomach (14 mSv), while the uterus (6.2 mSv), the lung (5.7 mSv) and the liver (5.5 mSv) were the most exposed in kidney transplant patients. The average cumulative effective dose (CED) of ionizing radiation among centres in this study was highly variable both in haemodialysis (from 6.4 to 18.8 mSv per patient-year; p = 0.018) and even more so in kidney transplant (from 0.6 to 13.7 mSv per patient-year; p = 0.002) patients. Conclusions: Radiation exposure attributable to medical imaging is high in distinct subgroups of haemodialysis and transplant patients. Furthermore, there is high inter-centre variability in radiation exposure, suggesting that nephrology units have substantially different clinical policies for the application of diagnostic imaging studies.
AB - Background and objectives: End stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are exposed to the risk of ionizing radiation during repeated imaging studies. The variability in diagnostic imaging policies and the accompanying radiation doses across various renal units is still unknown. We studied this variability at the centre level and quantified the associated radiation doses at the patient level. Methods: Fourteen Italian nephrology departments enrolled 739 patients on haemodialysis and 486 kidney transplant patients. The details of the radiological procedures performed over one year were recorded. The effective doses and organ doses of radiation were estimated for each patient using standardized methods to convert exposure parameters into effective and organ doses Results: Computed tomography (CT) was the major contributor (> 77%) to ionizing radiation exposure. Among the haemodialysis and kidney transplant patients, 15% and 6% were in the high (≥ 20 mSv per year) radiation dose groups, respectively. In haemodialysis patients, the most exposed organs were the liver (16 mSv), the kidney (15 mSv) and the stomach (14 mSv), while the uterus (6.2 mSv), the lung (5.7 mSv) and the liver (5.5 mSv) were the most exposed in kidney transplant patients. The average cumulative effective dose (CED) of ionizing radiation among centres in this study was highly variable both in haemodialysis (from 6.4 to 18.8 mSv per patient-year; p = 0.018) and even more so in kidney transplant (from 0.6 to 13.7 mSv per patient-year; p = 0.002) patients. Conclusions: Radiation exposure attributable to medical imaging is high in distinct subgroups of haemodialysis and transplant patients. Furthermore, there is high inter-centre variability in radiation exposure, suggesting that nephrology units have substantially different clinical policies for the application of diagnostic imaging studies.
KW - Cancer
KW - Haemodialysis
KW - Kidney transplantation
KW - Radiation dosimetry
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85098688769
U2 - 10.1007/s40620-020-00911-0
DO - 10.1007/s40620-020-00911-0
M3 - Article
SN - 1121-8428
VL - 34
SP - 791
EP - 799
JO - Journal of Nephrology
JF - Journal of Nephrology
IS - 3
ER -