Salta alla navigazione principale Salta alla ricerca Salta al contenuto principale

Prognostic value of intrinsic subtypes in hormone-receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

  • F. Schettini
  • , O. Martínez-Sáez
  • , C. Falato
  • , I. De Santo
  • , B. Conte
  • , I. Garcia-Fructuoso
  • , R. Gomez-Bravo
  • , E. Seguí
  • , N. Chic
  • , F. Brasó-Maristany
  • , L. Paré
  • , M. Vidal
  • , B. Adamo
  • , M. Muñoz
  • , T. Pascual
  • , E. Ciruelos
  • , C. M. Perou
  • , L. A. Carey
  • , A. Prat

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo su rivistaArticolo in rivistapeer review

Abstract

Background: In hormone receptor-positive (HoR+) breast cancer (BC), gene expression analysis identifies luminal A (LumA), luminal B (LumB), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-enriched (HER2-E), basal-like (BL) intrinsic subtypes and a normal-like group. This classification has an established prognostic value in early-stage HoR+ BC. Here, we carried out a trial-level meta-analysis to determine the prognostic ability of subtypes in metastatic BC (MBC). Materials and methods: We systematically reviewed all the available prospective phase II/III trials in HoR+ MBC where subtype was assessed. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS)/time to progression (TTP) of the LumA subtype compared to non-LumA. Secondary endpoints were PFS/TTP of each individual subtype, according to treatment, menopausal and HER2 status and overall survival (OS). The random-effect model was applied, and heterogeneity assessed through Cochran's Q and I2. Threshold for significance was set at P < 0.05. The study was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021255769). Results: Seven studies were included (2536 patients). Non-LumA represented 55.2% and was associated with worse PFS/TTP than LumA [hazard ratio (HR) 1.77, P < 0.001, I2 = 61%], independently of clinical HER2 status [Psubgroup difference (Psub) = 0.16], systemic treatment (Psub = 0.96) and menopausal status (Psub = 0.12). Non-LumA tumors also showed worse OS (HR 2.00, P < 0.001, I2 = 65%), with significantly different outcomes for LumB (PFS/TTP HR 1.46; OS HR 1.41), HER2-E (PFS/TTP HR 2.39; OS HR 2.08) and BL (PFS/TTP HR 2.67; OS HR 3.26), separately (PFS/TTP Psub = 0.01; OS Psub = 0.005). Sensitivity analyses supported the main result. No publication bias was observed. Conclusions: In HoR+ MBC, non-LumA disease is associated with poorer PFS/TTP and OS than LumA, independently of HER2, treatment and menopausal status. Future trials in HoR+ MBC should consider this clinically relevant biological classification.

Lingua originaleInglese
Numero di articolo101214
RivistaESMO Open
Volume8
Numero di pubblicazione3
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - giu 2023
Pubblicato esternamente

OSS delle Nazioni Unite

Questo processo contribuisce al raggiungimento dei seguenti obiettivi di sviluppo sostenibile

  1. SDG 3 - Salute e benessere
    SDG 3 Salute e benessere

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Prognostic value of intrinsic subtypes in hormone-receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo