Priorities for emergency department syncope research

Benjamin C. Sun; Giorgio Costantino; Franca Barbic; Ilaria Bossi; Giovanni Casazza; Franca Dipaola; Daniel McDermott; James Quinn; Matthew Reed; Robert S. Sheldon; Monica Solbiati; Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy; Andrew D. Krahn; Daniel Beach; Nicolai Bodemer; Michele Brignole; Ivo Casagranda; Piergiorgio Duca; Greta Falavigna; Roberto Ippoliti; Nicola Montano; Brian Olshansky; Satish R. Raj; Martin H. Ruwald; Win Kuang Shen; Ian Stiell; Andrea Ungar; J. Gert Van Dijk; Nynke Van Dijk; Wouter Wieling; Raffaello Furlan

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.04.014

Priorities for emergency department syncope research

Benjamin C. Sun
, Giorgio Costantino
, Franca Barbic
, Ilaria Bossi
, Giovanni Casazza
, Franca Dipaola
, Daniel McDermott
, James Quinn
, Matthew Reed
, Robert S. Sheldon
, Monica Solbiati
, Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy
, Andrew D. Krahn
, Daniel Beach
, Nicolai Bodemer
, Michele Brignole
, Ivo Casagranda
, Piergiorgio Duca
, Greta Falavigna
, Roberto Ippoliti

Nicola Montano, Brian Olshansky, Satish R. Raj, Martin H. Ruwald, Win Kuang Shen, Ian Stiell, Andrea Ungar, J. Gert Van Dijk, Nynke Van Dijk, Wouter Wieling, Raffaello Furlan

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo su rivista › Articolo in rivista › peer review

Abstract

Study objectives There is limited evidence to guide the emergency department (ED) evaluation and management of syncope. The First International Workshop on Syncope Risk Stratification in the Emergency Department identified key research questions and methodological standards essential to advancing the science of ED-based syncope research.

Methods We recruited a multinational panel of syncope experts. A preconference survey identified research priorities, which were refined during and after the conference through an iterative review process.

Results There were 31 participants from 7 countries who represented 10 clinical and methodological specialties. High-priority research recommendations were organized around a conceptual model of ED decisionmaking for syncope, and they address definition, cohort selection, risk stratification, and management.

Conclusion We convened a multispecialty group of syncope experts to identify the most pressing knowledge gaps and defined a high-priority research agenda to improve the care of patients with syncope in the ED.

Lingua originale	Inglese
pagine (da-a)	649-655.e2
Rivista	Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume	64
Numero di pubblicazione	6
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.04.014
Stato di pubblicazione	Pubblicato - 1 dic 2014
Pubblicato esternamente	Sì

Accesso al documento

10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.04.014

Altri file e collegamenti

Link to publication in Scopus

Cita questo

Sun, B. C., Costantino, G., Barbic, F., Bossi, I., Casazza, G., Dipaola, F., McDermott, D., Quinn, J., Reed, M., Sheldon, R. S., Solbiati, M., Thiruganasambandamoorthy, V., Krahn, A. D., Beach, D., Bodemer, N., Brignole, M., Casagranda, I., Duca, P., Falavigna, G., ... Furlan, R. (2014). Priorities for emergency department syncope research. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 64(6), 649-655.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.04.014

@article{dabfea682e1c46f4a050f347a5f131e9,

title = "Priorities for emergency department syncope research",

abstract = "Study objectives There is limited evidence to guide the emergency department (ED) evaluation and management of syncope. The First International Workshop on Syncope Risk Stratification in the Emergency Department identified key research questions and methodological standards essential to advancing the science of ED-based syncope research.Methods We recruited a multinational panel of syncope experts. A preconference survey identified research priorities, which were refined during and after the conference through an iterative review process.Results There were 31 participants from 7 countries who represented 10 clinical and methodological specialties. High-priority research recommendations were organized around a conceptual model of ED decisionmaking for syncope, and they address definition, cohort selection, risk stratification, and management.Conclusion We convened a multispecialty group of syncope experts to identify the most pressing knowledge gaps and defined a high-priority research agenda to improve the care of patients with syncope in the ED.",

author = "Sun, \{Benjamin C.\} and Giorgio Costantino and Franca Barbic and Ilaria Bossi and Giovanni Casazza and Franca Dipaola and Daniel McDermott and James Quinn and Matthew Reed and Sheldon, \{Robert S.\} and Monica Solbiati and Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy and Krahn, \{Andrew D.\} and Daniel Beach and Nicolai Bodemer and Michele Brignole and Ivo Casagranda and Piergiorgio Duca and Greta Falavigna and Roberto Ippoliti and Nicola Montano and Brian Olshansky and Raj, \{Satish R.\} and Ruwald, \{Martin H.\} and Shen, \{Win Kuang\} and Ian Stiell and Andrea Ungar and \{Van Dijk\}, \{J. Gert\} and \{Van Dijk\}, Nynke and Wouter Wieling and Raffaello Furlan",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2014 American College of Emergency Physicians.",

year = "2014",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.04.014",

language = "English",

volume = "64",

pages = "649--655.e2",

journal = "Annals of Emergency Medicine",

issn = "0196-0644",

publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

number = "6",

}

Sun, BC, Costantino, G, Barbic, F, Bossi, I, Casazza, G, Dipaola, F, McDermott, D, Quinn, J, Reed, M, Sheldon, RS, Solbiati, M, Thiruganasambandamoorthy, V, Krahn, AD, Beach, D, Bodemer, N, Brignole, M, Casagranda, I, Duca, P, Falavigna, G, Ippoliti, R, Montano, N, Olshansky, B, Raj, SR, Ruwald, MH, Shen, WK, Stiell, I, Ungar, A, Van Dijk, JG, Van Dijk, N, Wieling, W & Furlan, R 2014, 'Priorities for emergency department syncope research', Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol. 64, n. 6, pagg. 649-655.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.04.014

TY - JOUR

T1 - Priorities for emergency department syncope research

AU - Sun, Benjamin C.

AU - Costantino, Giorgio

AU - Barbic, Franca

AU - Bossi, Ilaria

AU - Casazza, Giovanni

AU - Dipaola, Franca

AU - McDermott, Daniel

AU - Quinn, James

AU - Reed, Matthew

AU - Sheldon, Robert S.

AU - Solbiati, Monica

AU - Thiruganasambandamoorthy, Venkatesh

AU - Krahn, Andrew D.

AU - Beach, Daniel

AU - Bodemer, Nicolai

AU - Brignole, Michele

AU - Casagranda, Ivo

AU - Duca, Piergiorgio

AU - Falavigna, Greta

AU - Ippoliti, Roberto

AU - Montano, Nicola

AU - Olshansky, Brian

AU - Raj, Satish R.

AU - Ruwald, Martin H.

AU - Shen, Win Kuang

AU - Stiell, Ian

AU - Ungar, Andrea

AU - Van Dijk, J. Gert

AU - Van Dijk, Nynke

AU - Wieling, Wouter

AU - Furlan, Raffaello

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - Study objectives There is limited evidence to guide the emergency department (ED) evaluation and management of syncope. The First International Workshop on Syncope Risk Stratification in the Emergency Department identified key research questions and methodological standards essential to advancing the science of ED-based syncope research.Methods We recruited a multinational panel of syncope experts. A preconference survey identified research priorities, which were refined during and after the conference through an iterative review process.Results There were 31 participants from 7 countries who represented 10 clinical and methodological specialties. High-priority research recommendations were organized around a conceptual model of ED decisionmaking for syncope, and they address definition, cohort selection, risk stratification, and management.Conclusion We convened a multispecialty group of syncope experts to identify the most pressing knowledge gaps and defined a high-priority research agenda to improve the care of patients with syncope in the ED.

AB - Study objectives There is limited evidence to guide the emergency department (ED) evaluation and management of syncope. The First International Workshop on Syncope Risk Stratification in the Emergency Department identified key research questions and methodological standards essential to advancing the science of ED-based syncope research.Methods We recruited a multinational panel of syncope experts. A preconference survey identified research priorities, which were refined during and after the conference through an iterative review process.Results There were 31 participants from 7 countries who represented 10 clinical and methodological specialties. High-priority research recommendations were organized around a conceptual model of ED decisionmaking for syncope, and they address definition, cohort selection, risk stratification, and management.Conclusion We convened a multispecialty group of syncope experts to identify the most pressing knowledge gaps and defined a high-priority research agenda to improve the care of patients with syncope in the ED.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84919456053

U2 - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.04.014

DO - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.04.014

M3 - Article

SN - 0196-0644

VL - 64

SP - 649-655.e2

JO - Annals of Emergency Medicine

JF - Annals of Emergency Medicine

IS - 6

ER -

Priorities for emergency department syncope research

Abstract

Accesso al documento

Altri file e collegamenti

Fingerprint

Cita questo