Preferential vs Rational description logics: Which one for reasoning about typicality?

Laura Giordano, Valentina Gliozzi, Nicola Olivetti, Gian Luca Pozzato

Risultato della ricerca: Capitolo in libro/report/atti di convegnoContributo a conferenzapeer review

Abstract

Extensions of Description Logics (DLs) to reason about typicality and defeasible inheritance have been largely investigated. In this paper, we consider two such extensions, namely (i) the extension of DLs with a typicality operator T, having the properties of Preferential nonmonotonic entailment P, and (ii) its variant with a typicality operator having the properties of the stronger Rational entailment R. The first one has been proposed in [6]. Here, we investigate the second one and we show, by a representation theorem, that it is equivalent to the approach to preferential subsumption proposed in [3]. We compare the two extensions, preferential and rational, and argue that the first one is more suitable than the second one to reason about typicality, as the latter leads to very unintuitive inferences.

Lingua originaleInglese
Titolo della pubblicazione ospiteECAI 2010
EditoreIOS Press
Pagine1069-1070
Numero di pagine2
ISBN (stampa)9781607506058
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2010
Evento2nd Workshop on Knowledge Representation for Health Care, KR4HC 2010, held in conjunction with the 19th European Conference in Artificial Intelligence, ECAI 2010 - Lisbon, Portugal
Durata: 17 ago 201017 ago 2010

Serie di pubblicazioni

NomeFrontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
Volume215
ISSN (stampa)0922-6389
ISSN (elettronico)1879-8314

???event.eventtypes.event.conference???

???event.eventtypes.event.conference???2nd Workshop on Knowledge Representation for Health Care, KR4HC 2010, held in conjunction with the 19th European Conference in Artificial Intelligence, ECAI 2010
Paese/TerritorioPortugal
CittàLisbon
Periodo17/08/1017/08/10

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Preferential vs Rational description logics: Which one for reasoning about typicality?'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo