TY - JOUR
T1 - Platelet Larger Cell Ratio and High-on Treatment Platelet Reactivity During Dual Antiplatelet Therapy
AU - Verdoia, Monica
AU - Pergolini, Patrizia
AU - Rolla, Roberta
AU - Nardin, Matteo
AU - Barbieri, Lucia
AU - Schaffer, Alon
AU - Bellomo, Giorgio
AU - Marino, Paolo
AU - Suryapranata, Harry
AU - De Luca, Giuseppe
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
PY - 2015/10/1
Y1 - 2015/10/1
N2 - Background: Low response to antiplatelet agents has been associated to an increased risk of thrombotic complications and recurrent ischemic events. Platelet size has been proposed as a potential marker of platelet reactivity. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of platelet Larger Cell Ratio (p-LCR) on platelet aggregation and the prevalence of residual high-on treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after a recent acute coronary syndrome or coronary revascularization. Methods: Patients treated with DAPT (ASA and clopidogrel or ticagrelor) were scheduled for platelet function assessment at 30–90 days post-discharge. HRPR was considered for ASPI test >862 AU*min (for ASA) or ADP test values ≥417 AU*min (for ADP-antagonists) using impedance aggregometry. Results: Our population consisted of 530 patients receiving DAPT, who were divided in tertiles according to values of p-LCR (< 27.6; 27.6–34.7; ≥34.7 l). p-LCR was related with use of beta-blockers (p = 0.02) and statins (p = 0.002), and inversely with acute presentation (p = 0.05). Higher platelet count (p < 0.001) and haemoglobin levels (p = 0.001) were observed in higher p-LCR tertiles. The prevalence of HRPR for ASA was low and not significantly different across tertiles of p-LCR (1.1 vs 1.1 vs 1.7 %, p = 0.66; adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.68[0.66–4.29], p = 0.27). Moreover, p-LCR did not influence the occurrence of HRPR for ADP-antagonists (24.4 % vs 20.9 % vs 25.6 %%, p = 0.80, adjusted OR[95%CI] = 0.88[0.67–1.17], p = 0.38) and similar results were obtained when considering separately patients receiving clopidogrel (adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.21[0.86–1.69], p = 0.29) or ticagrelor (adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.17[0.69–2], p = 0.56). Conclusion: In patients receiving DAPT for coronary artery disease, p-LCR does not impact platelet reactivity. Larger platelets did not influence the prevalence of high-on treatment platelet reactivity with the antiplatelet agents ASA, clopidogrel or ticagrelor.
AB - Background: Low response to antiplatelet agents has been associated to an increased risk of thrombotic complications and recurrent ischemic events. Platelet size has been proposed as a potential marker of platelet reactivity. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of platelet Larger Cell Ratio (p-LCR) on platelet aggregation and the prevalence of residual high-on treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after a recent acute coronary syndrome or coronary revascularization. Methods: Patients treated with DAPT (ASA and clopidogrel or ticagrelor) were scheduled for platelet function assessment at 30–90 days post-discharge. HRPR was considered for ASPI test >862 AU*min (for ASA) or ADP test values ≥417 AU*min (for ADP-antagonists) using impedance aggregometry. Results: Our population consisted of 530 patients receiving DAPT, who were divided in tertiles according to values of p-LCR (< 27.6; 27.6–34.7; ≥34.7 l). p-LCR was related with use of beta-blockers (p = 0.02) and statins (p = 0.002), and inversely with acute presentation (p = 0.05). Higher platelet count (p < 0.001) and haemoglobin levels (p = 0.001) were observed in higher p-LCR tertiles. The prevalence of HRPR for ASA was low and not significantly different across tertiles of p-LCR (1.1 vs 1.1 vs 1.7 %, p = 0.66; adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.68[0.66–4.29], p = 0.27). Moreover, p-LCR did not influence the occurrence of HRPR for ADP-antagonists (24.4 % vs 20.9 % vs 25.6 %%, p = 0.80, adjusted OR[95%CI] = 0.88[0.67–1.17], p = 0.38) and similar results were obtained when considering separately patients receiving clopidogrel (adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.21[0.86–1.69], p = 0.29) or ticagrelor (adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.17[0.69–2], p = 0.56). Conclusion: In patients receiving DAPT for coronary artery disease, p-LCR does not impact platelet reactivity. Larger platelets did not influence the prevalence of high-on treatment platelet reactivity with the antiplatelet agents ASA, clopidogrel or ticagrelor.
KW - Clopidogrel
KW - Coronary artery disease
KW - Dual antiplatelet therapy
KW - Platelet aggregation
KW - Platelet larger cell ratio
KW - Ticagrelor
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946496338&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10557-015-6616-3
DO - 10.1007/s10557-015-6616-3
M3 - Article
SN - 0920-3206
VL - 29
SP - 443
EP - 450
JO - Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy
JF - Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy
IS - 5
ER -