Abstract
Objective: To compare the peri-operative outcomes between total laparo-endoscopic single-site (LESS) and robotic approaches for the staging and treatment of early stage endometrial cancer patients. Methods: A multicentre retrospective study involving three Italian gynaecological groups and one American centre. The peri-operative outcomes of LESS and robotic approach were compared in similar groups of patients, with regard to surgical outcomes and intra- and post-operative parameters and complications. Results: During the study period, 75 patients submitted to a total LESS hysterectomy and 75 patients received a total robotic hysterectomy. The median operative time - 122 versus 175 min (p = 0.0001) - and the estimated blood loss - 50 versus 80 mL (p = 0.03) - were slightly more favourable in the LESS group. The intra-operative complications were equally distributed (p = 0.99); in the robotic group there were 4 (5.3%) post-operative grade IIIb complications versus 1 (1.3%) in the LESS group (p = 0.172). Conclusions: The LESS and robotic approaches both appear reasonable and each may have benefits and limitations depending upon the patient population. Further studies are needed to validate these preliminary conclusions.
| Lingua originale | Inglese |
|---|---|
| pagine (da-a) | 552-555 |
| Numero di pagine | 4 |
| Rivista | Gynecologic Oncology |
| Volume | 125 |
| Numero di pubblicazione | 3 |
| DOI | |
| Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - giu 2012 |
| Pubblicato esternamente | Sì |