TY - JOUR
T1 - Perioperative Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Partial Nephrectomy
T2 - A Prospective Multicenter Observational Study (The RECORd 2 Project)
AU - Bravi, Carlo Andrea
AU - Larcher, Alessandro
AU - Capitanio, Umberto
AU - Mari, Andrea
AU - Antonelli, Alessandro
AU - Artibani, Walter
AU - Barale, Maurizio
AU - Bertini, Roberto
AU - Bove, Pierluigi
AU - Brunocilla, Eugenio
AU - Da Pozzo, Luigi
AU - Di Maida, Fabrizio
AU - Fiori, Cristian
AU - Gontero, Paolo
AU - Li Marzi, Vincenzo
AU - Longo, Nicola
AU - Mirone, Vincenzo
AU - Montanari, Emanuele
AU - Porpiglia, Francesco
AU - Schiavina, Riccardo
AU - Schips, Luigi
AU - Simeone, Claudio
AU - Siracusano, Salvatore
AU - Terrone, Carlo
AU - Trombetta, Carlo
AU - Volpe, Alessandro
AU - Montorsi, Francesco
AU - Ficarra, Vincenzo
AU - Carini, Marco
AU - Minervini, Andrea
AU - Altieri, Vincenzo
AU - Berardinelli, Francesco
AU - Borghesi, Marco
AU - Celia, Antonio
AU - Cindolo, Luca
AU - Costantini, Elisabetta
AU - Daja, Julian
AU - Falsaperla, Mario
AU - Furlan, Maria
AU - Morgia, Giuseppe
AU - Porreca, Angelo
AU - Roscigno, Marco
AU - Selli, Cesare
AU - Simonato, Alchiede
AU - Tellini, Riccardo
AU - Vespasiani, Giuseppe
AU - Villari, Donata
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019
PY - 2021/3
Y1 - 2021/3
N2 - Background: Partial nephrectomy (PN) has a non-negligible perioperative morbidity. Comparative evidence of the available surgical techniques is limited. Objective: To compare the perioperative outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic PN. Methods: Data of 2331 patients treated with PN for cT1 renal tumors were extracted from the RECORd2 database, a prospective multicenter project. Multivariable regression models assessed the relationship between surgical technique and surgical margins, warm ischemia time, postoperative complications, and acute kidney injury (AKI). The probability of achieving a modified trifecta (negative margins, warm ischemia time <25 min, and no Clavien–Dindo ≥2 complications) was examined for each surgical approach. Results: Minimally invasive techniques had lower rate of Clavien–Dindo ≥2 complications than that of open surgery (odds ratio [OR] for robotic surgery: 0.27; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.15–0.47, p < 0.0001; OR for laparoscopy: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.34–0.78; p = 0.002). The probability of receiving ischemia was highest for robotic PN (p < 0.001). Among on-clamp PN, laparoscopy had longer ischemia than open (estimate: 1.09; 95% CI: –0.00 to 2.18; p = 0.050) and robotic (estimate: 1.36; 95% CI: 0.31–2.40; p = 0.011) surgery. When compared with open PN, the risk of AKI was roughly halved for patients treated by robotic and laparoscopic surgery (both p < 0.0001). Positive margins rate did not differ between the groups (all p ≥ 0.1). The likelihood to achieve a modified trifecta was not affected by surgical technique in the overall population (all p ≥ 0.075). In Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical (PADUA) score < 10 lesions, robotic surgery had higher probability of achieving a modified trifecta than open PN (OR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.09–2.53; p = 0.018) and laparoscopy (OR: 1.34; 95% CI: 0.94–1.90; p = 0.11). Conclusions: In PADUA < 10 renal tumors, robotic PN allows for higher rates of trifecta than open and laparoscopic surgeries. The impact of surgical technique on perioperative outcomes of PN might be limited in more complex lesions. Patient summary: We evaluated the association between surgical technique and perioperative outcomes of partial nephrectomy. In less complex (Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical [PADUA] score < 10) lesions, robotic PN allows for higher rates of trifecta when compared with other surgical techniques.
AB - Background: Partial nephrectomy (PN) has a non-negligible perioperative morbidity. Comparative evidence of the available surgical techniques is limited. Objective: To compare the perioperative outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic PN. Methods: Data of 2331 patients treated with PN for cT1 renal tumors were extracted from the RECORd2 database, a prospective multicenter project. Multivariable regression models assessed the relationship between surgical technique and surgical margins, warm ischemia time, postoperative complications, and acute kidney injury (AKI). The probability of achieving a modified trifecta (negative margins, warm ischemia time <25 min, and no Clavien–Dindo ≥2 complications) was examined for each surgical approach. Results: Minimally invasive techniques had lower rate of Clavien–Dindo ≥2 complications than that of open surgery (odds ratio [OR] for robotic surgery: 0.27; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.15–0.47, p < 0.0001; OR for laparoscopy: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.34–0.78; p = 0.002). The probability of receiving ischemia was highest for robotic PN (p < 0.001). Among on-clamp PN, laparoscopy had longer ischemia than open (estimate: 1.09; 95% CI: –0.00 to 2.18; p = 0.050) and robotic (estimate: 1.36; 95% CI: 0.31–2.40; p = 0.011) surgery. When compared with open PN, the risk of AKI was roughly halved for patients treated by robotic and laparoscopic surgery (both p < 0.0001). Positive margins rate did not differ between the groups (all p ≥ 0.1). The likelihood to achieve a modified trifecta was not affected by surgical technique in the overall population (all p ≥ 0.075). In Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical (PADUA) score < 10 lesions, robotic surgery had higher probability of achieving a modified trifecta than open PN (OR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.09–2.53; p = 0.018) and laparoscopy (OR: 1.34; 95% CI: 0.94–1.90; p = 0.11). Conclusions: In PADUA < 10 renal tumors, robotic PN allows for higher rates of trifecta than open and laparoscopic surgeries. The impact of surgical technique on perioperative outcomes of PN might be limited in more complex lesions. Patient summary: We evaluated the association between surgical technique and perioperative outcomes of partial nephrectomy. In less complex (Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical [PADUA] score < 10) lesions, robotic PN allows for higher rates of trifecta when compared with other surgical techniques.
KW - Acute kidney injury
KW - Laparoscopy
KW - Partial nephrectomy
KW - Perioperative outcomes
KW - Renal cell carcinoma
KW - Robotic surgery
KW - Trifecta
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075516515&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.euf.2019.10.013
DO - 10.1016/j.euf.2019.10.013
M3 - Article
SN - 2405-4569
VL - 7
SP - 390
EP - 396
JO - European Urology Focus
JF - European Urology Focus
IS - 2
ER -