TY - JOUR
T1 - Overview of potential determinants of radical prostatectomy versus radiation therapy in management of clinically localized prostate cancer
T2 - Results from an Italian, prospective, observational study (the Pros-IT CNR study)
AU - Pros-IT CNRstudy group
AU - Antonelli, Alessandro
AU - Palumbo, Carlotta
AU - Noale, Marianna
AU - Artibani, Walter
AU - Bassi, Pierfrancesco
AU - Bertoni, Filippo
AU - Bracarda, Sergio
AU - Bruni, Alessio
AU - Corvò, Renzo
AU - Gacci, Mauro
AU - Magrini, Stefano M.
AU - Montironi, Rodolfo
AU - Porreca, Angelo
AU - Tubaro, Andrea
AU - Zagonel, Vittorina
AU - Maggi, Stefania
AU - Alitto, Anna R.
AU - Ambrosi, Enrica
AU - Aristei, Cynthia
AU - Barbieri, Michele
AU - Bardari, Franco
AU - Bardoscia, Lilia
AU - Barra, Salvina
AU - Bartoncini, Sara
AU - Basso, Umberto
AU - Becherini, Carlotta
AU - Bellavita, Rita
AU - Bergamaschi, Franco
AU - Berlingheri, Stefania
AU - Berruti, Alfredo
AU - Borghesi, Marco
AU - Bortolus, Roberto
AU - Borzillo, Valentina
AU - Bosetti, Davide
AU - Bove, Giuseppe
AU - Bove, Pierluigi
AU - Brausi, Maurizio
AU - Bruno, Giorgio
AU - Brunocilla, Eugenio
AU - Buffoli, Alberto
AU - Buglione, Michela
AU - Buttigliero, Consuelo
AU - Cacciamani, Giovanni
AU - Caldiroli, Michela
AU - Cardo, Giuseppe
AU - Carmignani, Giorgio
AU - Carrieri, Giuseppe
AU - Castelli, Emanuele
AU - Castrezzati, Elisabetta
AU - Catalano, Gianpiero
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA
PY - 2020/10
Y1 - 2020/10
N2 - BACKGROUND: We assessed patients and tumor characteristics, as well as health-related quality of life (HRQoL) items, associated with curative intent treatment decision-making in clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa) patients. METHODS: Clinically localized PCa treated with either radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiation therapy (RT) within 12 months from diagnosis were abstracted from The PROState cancer monitoring in ITaly, from the National Research Council (Pros-IT CNR) database. Multivariable logistic regression (MLR) models predicting RT vs. RP were fitted, after adjustment for HRQoL items, patients and tumor characteristics. RESULTS: Of 1041 patients, 631 (60.2%) were treated with RP and 410 (39.8%) with RT. Relative to RT, RP patients were younger age (mean age 64.5±6.6 vs. 71.4±4.9, P<0.001) and had higher rates of D’Amico low-intermediate risk groups (31.8 vs. 21.9% low, 46.3% vs. 43.5% intermediate and 21.9% vs. 34.6% high risk, P<0.001). Overall, 93.2% of RP patients were enrolled by urologists and 82.7% of RT patients by radiation oncologists. RP patients had generally higher means values of HRQoL items. In MLR models, higher RT rates were independently associated with more advanced age (odds ratio [OR] 6.14, P<0.001) and BMI≥30 kg/m2 (OR 1.78, P<0.001). Conversely, lower rates of RT were independently associated with married (OR 0.55, P=0.01) and worker status (OR 0.52, P=0.004), enrollment in academic centers (OR 0.59, P=0.005) and higher physical composite score (OR 0.88, P=0.03) and baseline sexual function items (OR 0.92, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with clinically localized prostate cancer undergoing definitive treatment at Italian institutions receive RP instead of RT. Moreover, those who are younger, married, working, as well as those with better physical and sexual function are more likely to undergo surgery.
AB - BACKGROUND: We assessed patients and tumor characteristics, as well as health-related quality of life (HRQoL) items, associated with curative intent treatment decision-making in clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa) patients. METHODS: Clinically localized PCa treated with either radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiation therapy (RT) within 12 months from diagnosis were abstracted from The PROState cancer monitoring in ITaly, from the National Research Council (Pros-IT CNR) database. Multivariable logistic regression (MLR) models predicting RT vs. RP were fitted, after adjustment for HRQoL items, patients and tumor characteristics. RESULTS: Of 1041 patients, 631 (60.2%) were treated with RP and 410 (39.8%) with RT. Relative to RT, RP patients were younger age (mean age 64.5±6.6 vs. 71.4±4.9, P<0.001) and had higher rates of D’Amico low-intermediate risk groups (31.8 vs. 21.9% low, 46.3% vs. 43.5% intermediate and 21.9% vs. 34.6% high risk, P<0.001). Overall, 93.2% of RP patients were enrolled by urologists and 82.7% of RT patients by radiation oncologists. RP patients had generally higher means values of HRQoL items. In MLR models, higher RT rates were independently associated with more advanced age (odds ratio [OR] 6.14, P<0.001) and BMI≥30 kg/m2 (OR 1.78, P<0.001). Conversely, lower rates of RT were independently associated with married (OR 0.55, P=0.01) and worker status (OR 0.52, P=0.004), enrollment in academic centers (OR 0.59, P=0.005) and higher physical composite score (OR 0.88, P=0.03) and baseline sexual function items (OR 0.92, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with clinically localized prostate cancer undergoing definitive treatment at Italian institutions receive RP instead of RT. Moreover, those who are younger, married, working, as well as those with better physical and sexual function are more likely to undergo surgery.
KW - Decision making
KW - Prostatectomy
KW - Prostatic neoplasms
KW - Quality of life
KW - Radiotherapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091438819&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03637-3
DO - 10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03637-3
M3 - Review article
SN - 0393-2249
VL - 72
SP - 595
EP - 604
JO - Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica
JF - Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica
IS - 5
ER -