TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimized ‘Full Right’ Instrument Configuration in Robotic Rectal Surgery With the Da Vinci Xi System
T2 - A Prospective Single-Center Experience
AU - Monsellato, Igor
AU - Gatto, Teresa
AU - Palucci, Marco
AU - Sangiuolo, Federico
AU - Alagia, Mariantonietta
AU - Giannone, Fabio
AU - Cassese, Gianluca
AU - Del Basso, Celeste
AU - Del Angel-Millán, Gabriela
AU - Panaro, Fabrizio
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - Background: Robotic surgery for rectal cancer offers enhanced visualization, instrument articulation, and ergonomic benefits in confined pelvic spaces. However, the effectiveness of robotic procedures depends heavily on trocar positioning and instrument layout. Conventional configurations often require intraoperative instrument swapping or camera repositioning, potentially disrupting workflow and increasing cognitive strain. To address these limitations, we implemented a standardized “full right” instrument configuration using the Da Vinci Xi system to improve ergonomic control and procedural stability. Methods: We conducted a prospective analysis of 22 consecutive patients undergoing robotic rectal resection at a high-volume tertiary center using the full right configuration. All robotic arms and the assistant port were positioned along the patient’s right side, with the camera fixed on Arm 2 throughout the procedure. Operative, perioperative, and pathological outcomes were evaluated. Results: The mean console time was 170 min, and the mean operative time was 192 min. No conversions or intraoperative complications occurred. No instrument collisions were observed. Estimated blood loss was minimal in all cases. The mean hospital stay was 5.2 days. All patients achieved complete (grade 3) mesorectal excision, with a mean lymph node yield of 16.4 and negative margins in every case. No major postoperative complications were reported. Conclusions: The full right configuration for robotic rectal resection is associated with favorable short-term outcomes, improved ergonomic conditions, and stable instrument positioning. This layout supports consistent workflow across all operative phases and may reduce intraoperative cognitive load. Further validation through larger comparative studies is warranted.
AB - Background: Robotic surgery for rectal cancer offers enhanced visualization, instrument articulation, and ergonomic benefits in confined pelvic spaces. However, the effectiveness of robotic procedures depends heavily on trocar positioning and instrument layout. Conventional configurations often require intraoperative instrument swapping or camera repositioning, potentially disrupting workflow and increasing cognitive strain. To address these limitations, we implemented a standardized “full right” instrument configuration using the Da Vinci Xi system to improve ergonomic control and procedural stability. Methods: We conducted a prospective analysis of 22 consecutive patients undergoing robotic rectal resection at a high-volume tertiary center using the full right configuration. All robotic arms and the assistant port were positioned along the patient’s right side, with the camera fixed on Arm 2 throughout the procedure. Operative, perioperative, and pathological outcomes were evaluated. Results: The mean console time was 170 min, and the mean operative time was 192 min. No conversions or intraoperative complications occurred. No instrument collisions were observed. Estimated blood loss was minimal in all cases. The mean hospital stay was 5.2 days. All patients achieved complete (grade 3) mesorectal excision, with a mean lymph node yield of 16.4 and negative margins in every case. No major postoperative complications were reported. Conclusions: The full right configuration for robotic rectal resection is associated with favorable short-term outcomes, improved ergonomic conditions, and stable instrument positioning. This layout supports consistent workflow across all operative phases and may reduce intraoperative cognitive load. Further validation through larger comparative studies is warranted.
KW - instrument position
KW - rectal cancer
KW - rectal resection
KW - robotic colorectal surgery
KW - trocar position
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105014348457
U2 - 10.1177/15533506251374470
DO - 10.1177/15533506251374470
M3 - Article
SN - 1553-3506
VL - 32
SP - 495
EP - 501
JO - Surgical Innovation
JF - Surgical Innovation
IS - 6
ER -