TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimization of the future remnant liver: review of the current strategies in Europe
AU - Memeo, R
AU - Conticchio, M
AU - Deshayes, E
AU - Nadalin, S
AU - Herrero, A
AU - Guiu, B
AU - PANARO, Fabrizio
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Liver resection still represent the treatment of choice for liver malignancies, but in some cases inadequate future remnant liver (FRL) can lead to post hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) that still represents the most common cause of death after hepatectomy. Several strategies in recent era have been developed in order to generate a compensatory hypertrophy of the FRL, reducing the risk of post hepatectomy liver failure. Portal vein embolization, portal vein ligation, and ALLPS are the most popular techniques historically adopted up to now. The liver venous deprivation and the radio-embolization are the most recent promising techniques. Despite even more precise tools to calculate the relationship among volume and function, such as scintigraphy with Tc-99m-mebrofenin (HBS), no consensus is still available to define which of the above mentioned augmentation strategy is more adequate in terms of kind of surgery, complexity of the pathology and quality of liver parenchyma. The aim of this article is to analyse these different strategies to achieve sufficient FRL.
AB - Liver resection still represent the treatment of choice for liver malignancies, but in some cases inadequate future remnant liver (FRL) can lead to post hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) that still represents the most common cause of death after hepatectomy. Several strategies in recent era have been developed in order to generate a compensatory hypertrophy of the FRL, reducing the risk of post hepatectomy liver failure. Portal vein embolization, portal vein ligation, and ALLPS are the most popular techniques historically adopted up to now. The liver venous deprivation and the radio-embolization are the most recent promising techniques. Despite even more precise tools to calculate the relationship among volume and function, such as scintigraphy with Tc-99m-mebrofenin (HBS), no consensus is still available to define which of the above mentioned augmentation strategy is more adequate in terms of kind of surgery, complexity of the pathology and quality of liver parenchyma. The aim of this article is to analyse these different strategies to achieve sufficient FRL.
UR - https://iris.uniupo.it/handle/11579/171692
U2 - 10.21037/hbsn-20-394
DO - 10.21037/hbsn-20-394
M3 - Article
SN - 2304-3881
VL - 10
SP - 350
EP - 363
JO - HEPATOBILIARY SURGERY AND NUTRITION
JF - HEPATOBILIARY SURGERY AND NUTRITION
IS - 3
ER -