TY - JOUR
T1 - Open versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for clinical T1a renal masses
T2 - A matched-pair comparison of 280 patients with TRIFECTA outcomes (RECORd Project)
AU - Minervini, Andrea
AU - Siena, Giampaolo
AU - Antonelli, Alessandro
AU - Bianchi, Giampaolo
AU - Bocciardi, Aldo Massimo
AU - Cosciani Cunico, Sergio
AU - Ficarra, Vincenzo
AU - Fiori, Cristian
AU - Fusco, Ferdinando
AU - Mari, Andrea
AU - Martorana, Giuseppe
AU - Medica, Mauro
AU - Mirone, Vincenzo
AU - Morgia, Giuseppe
AU - Porpiglia, Francesco
AU - Rocco, Francesco
AU - Rovereto, Bruno
AU - Schiavina, Riccardo
AU - Simeone, Claudio
AU - Terrone, Carlo
AU - Volpe, Alessandro
AU - Carini, Marco
AU - Serni, Sergio
PY - 2014/2
Y1 - 2014/2
N2 - Aim of the study: To report a matched-pair comparative analysis between open (OPN) and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for clinical (c) T1a renal masses from a large prospective multicenter dataset. Materials and methods: The RECORd Project includes all patients who underwent OPN and LPN for kidney cancer between January 2009 and January 2011 at 19 Italian centers. Open and laparoscopic groups were compared regarding clinical, surgical, pathologic, functional results and TRIFECTA outcome. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to analyze predictors of WIT >25 min, surgical complications (SC) and the achievement of the TRIFECTA outcome. Results: Overall, 301 patients had OPN and 149 LPN. Groups were matched 1:1 (140 matched pairs) for clinical diameter, tumor location and type of indication. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy was associated with a significantly mean longer WIT (19.9 vs. 15.1 min; p < 0.001), and it was an independent predictor of a WIT >25 min (RR 6.29, p < 0.0001). The TRIFECTA was achieved in 78.6 and 74.3 % after OPN and LPN (p = ns), respectively, and the surgical approach was not a predictor of a negative TRIFECTA and SC at multivariable analysis. At 6-month follow-up, no significant differences were observed between the OPN and LPN group both in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ({increment}GFR 1.1 vs. 4.1 mL/min) and in new-onset stage III-V chronic kidney disease (CKD) rate (0 vs. 0.7 %). Conclusion: No significant difference in achieving the TRIFECTA outcome was reported after OPN and LPN. LPN was associated with a significantly longer WIT. However, eGFR at 6-month follow-up did not differ significantly between the two surgical approaches.
AB - Aim of the study: To report a matched-pair comparative analysis between open (OPN) and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for clinical (c) T1a renal masses from a large prospective multicenter dataset. Materials and methods: The RECORd Project includes all patients who underwent OPN and LPN for kidney cancer between January 2009 and January 2011 at 19 Italian centers. Open and laparoscopic groups were compared regarding clinical, surgical, pathologic, functional results and TRIFECTA outcome. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to analyze predictors of WIT >25 min, surgical complications (SC) and the achievement of the TRIFECTA outcome. Results: Overall, 301 patients had OPN and 149 LPN. Groups were matched 1:1 (140 matched pairs) for clinical diameter, tumor location and type of indication. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy was associated with a significantly mean longer WIT (19.9 vs. 15.1 min; p < 0.001), and it was an independent predictor of a WIT >25 min (RR 6.29, p < 0.0001). The TRIFECTA was achieved in 78.6 and 74.3 % after OPN and LPN (p = ns), respectively, and the surgical approach was not a predictor of a negative TRIFECTA and SC at multivariable analysis. At 6-month follow-up, no significant differences were observed between the OPN and LPN group both in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ({increment}GFR 1.1 vs. 4.1 mL/min) and in new-onset stage III-V chronic kidney disease (CKD) rate (0 vs. 0.7 %). Conclusion: No significant difference in achieving the TRIFECTA outcome was reported after OPN and LPN. LPN was associated with a significantly longer WIT. However, eGFR at 6-month follow-up did not differ significantly between the two surgical approaches.
KW - Kidney cancer
KW - Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
KW - Laparoscopic versus open matched-pair comparison
KW - Open partial nephrectomy
KW - TRIFECTA
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893691526&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00345-013-1155-7
DO - 10.1007/s00345-013-1155-7
M3 - Article
SN - 0724-4983
VL - 32
SP - 257
EP - 263
JO - World Journal of Urology
JF - World Journal of Urology
IS - 1
ER -