TY - JOUR
T1 - Novel endoscopic scoring system for immune mediated colitis
T2 - a multicenter retrospective study of 674 patients
AU - Wang, Yinghong
AU - Abu-Sbeih, Hamzah
AU - Tang, Tenglong
AU - Shatila, Malek
AU - Faleck, David
AU - Harris, Jessica
AU - Dougan, Michael
AU - Olsson-Brown, Anna
AU - Johnson, Douglas B.
AU - Shi, Chanjuan
AU - Grivas, Petros
AU - Diamantopoulos, Leonidas
AU - Owen, Dwight H.
AU - Cassol, Clarissa
AU - Arnold, Christina A.
AU - Warner, David E.
AU - Alva, Ajjai
AU - Powell, Nick
AU - Ibraheim, Hajir
AU - De Toni, Enrico N.
AU - Philipp, Alexander B.
AU - Philpott, Jessica
AU - Sleiman, Joseph
AU - Lythgoe, Mark
AU - Daniels, Ella
AU - Sandhu, Shahneen
AU - Weppler, Alison M.
AU - Buckle, Andrew
AU - Pinato, David J.
AU - Thomas, Anusha
AU - Qiao, Wei
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
PY - 2024/8
Y1 - 2024/8
N2 - Background and Aims: No endoscopic scoring system has been established for immune-mediated colitis (IMC). This study aimed to establish such a system for IMC and explore its utility in guiding future selective immunosuppressive therapy (SIT) use compared to clinical symptoms. Methods: This retrospective, international, 14-center study included 674 patients who developed IMC after immunotherapy and underwent endoscopic evaluation. Ten endoscopic features were selected by group consensus and assigned 1 point each to calculate an IMC endoscopic score (IMCES). IMCES cutoffs were chosen to maximize specificity for SIT use. This specificity was compared between IMCESs, and clinical symptoms were graded according to a standardized instrument. Results: A total of 309 (45.8%) patients received SIT. IMCES specificity for SIT use was 82.8% with a cutoff of 4. The inclusion of ulceration as a mandatory criterion resulted in higher specificity (85.0% for a cutoff of 4). In comparison, the specificity of a Mayo endoscopic subscore of 3 was 74.6%, and the specificity of clinical symptom grading was much lower at 27.4% and 12.3%, respectively. Early endoscopy was associated with timely SIT use (P <.001; r = 0.4084). Conclusions: This is the largest multicenter study to devise an endoscopic scoring system to guide IMC management. An IMCES cutoff of 4 has a higher specificity for SIT use than clinical symptoms, supporting early endoscopic evaluation for IMC.
AB - Background and Aims: No endoscopic scoring system has been established for immune-mediated colitis (IMC). This study aimed to establish such a system for IMC and explore its utility in guiding future selective immunosuppressive therapy (SIT) use compared to clinical symptoms. Methods: This retrospective, international, 14-center study included 674 patients who developed IMC after immunotherapy and underwent endoscopic evaluation. Ten endoscopic features were selected by group consensus and assigned 1 point each to calculate an IMC endoscopic score (IMCES). IMCES cutoffs were chosen to maximize specificity for SIT use. This specificity was compared between IMCESs, and clinical symptoms were graded according to a standardized instrument. Results: A total of 309 (45.8%) patients received SIT. IMCES specificity for SIT use was 82.8% with a cutoff of 4. The inclusion of ulceration as a mandatory criterion resulted in higher specificity (85.0% for a cutoff of 4). In comparison, the specificity of a Mayo endoscopic subscore of 3 was 74.6%, and the specificity of clinical symptom grading was much lower at 27.4% and 12.3%, respectively. Early endoscopy was associated with timely SIT use (P <.001; r = 0.4084). Conclusions: This is the largest multicenter study to devise an endoscopic scoring system to guide IMC management. An IMCES cutoff of 4 has a higher specificity for SIT use than clinical symptoms, supporting early endoscopic evaluation for IMC.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85196046283
U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2024.01.024
DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2024.01.024
M3 - Article
SN - 0016-5107
VL - 100
SP - 273-282.e4
JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
IS - 2
ER -