Abstract
LC: «Excuse me, Sciascia, but I think 1912 + 1 is more an essay than a short story. What do you say?» LS: «The truth? I would like to have been walking alongside my reader, but instead I find myself running. It’s d’Annunzio’s fault. Gabriele is a would-be flâneur as well as a devotee – in keeping with the French adepte – of creating caricature through citation. And yet, whether we see this or not, he taught us to be students of ourselves, and to engage precisely at the point of intersection with language, which, in essence, is the rhetoric of nowhere and everywhere. With d’Annunzio, you’re always elsewhere – sorry, ailleurs – and yet with Him, too. My text, then, is an example of what perhaps today, in English (but why are you all speaking English?) would be called ‘a Personal Essay’».
| Titolo tradotto del contributo | [Machine translation] Not only D'Annunzio: 1912+1 as an essay. |
|---|---|
| Lingua originale | Italian |
| pagine (da-a) | 53-62 |
| Numero di pagine | 10 |
| Rivista | TODOMODO |
| Volume | IV |
| Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2014 |
Keywords
- Critica dannunziana
- Gabriele d’Annunzio
- Filippo Tommaso Marinetti
- metascrittura
- Aldo Palazzeschi
- Giovanni Papini
- revenant
- Luigi Russolo
- saggio.
Fingerprint
Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Non solo d’Annunzio: 1912+1 come saggio.'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.Cita questo
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver