TY - JOUR
T1 - Non-Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients
T2 - A Guide for Emergency Physicians
AU - Beltrame, Michela
AU - Bellan, Mattia
AU - Patrucco, Filippo
AU - Gavelli, Francesco
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by the authors.
PY - 2025/10
Y1 - 2025/10
N2 - Hemodynamic monitoring is fundamental in the management of critically ill patients with acute circulatory failure. The invasiveness of conventional devices, however, often limits their applicability in the emergency department (ED). Recent advances have introduced non-invasive modalities (including echocardiography, bioreactance, and plethysmography) that extend the use of hemodynamic assessment beyond the intensive care unit. Among various available techniques, bedside ultrasound (Point-of-Care Ultrasound, POCUS) emerges as a particularly versatile tool for rapid and comprehensive assessment of cardiac function and volume status. When integrated with continuous technologies such as bioreactance or pulse contour analysis, it allows for the adoption of more dynamic and personalized fluid management strategies. Currently, a multimodal and patient-centered approach represents the most effective paradigm for non-invasive hemodynamic evaluation in the emergency setting. This strategy enhances diagnostic accuracy and enables timely interventions guided by pathophysiological principles. Despite the inherent limitations of each technique, their integration provides emergency physicians with real-time information, with potential benefits on clinical outcomes and resource utilization. This review aims to outline the pathophysiological rationale for adopting non-invasive monitoring in the ED and to critically evaluate the advantages and limitations of each technique, providing emergency physicians with a concise framework to guide clinical practice.
AB - Hemodynamic monitoring is fundamental in the management of critically ill patients with acute circulatory failure. The invasiveness of conventional devices, however, often limits their applicability in the emergency department (ED). Recent advances have introduced non-invasive modalities (including echocardiography, bioreactance, and plethysmography) that extend the use of hemodynamic assessment beyond the intensive care unit. Among various available techniques, bedside ultrasound (Point-of-Care Ultrasound, POCUS) emerges as a particularly versatile tool for rapid and comprehensive assessment of cardiac function and volume status. When integrated with continuous technologies such as bioreactance or pulse contour analysis, it allows for the adoption of more dynamic and personalized fluid management strategies. Currently, a multimodal and patient-centered approach represents the most effective paradigm for non-invasive hemodynamic evaluation in the emergency setting. This strategy enhances diagnostic accuracy and enables timely interventions guided by pathophysiological principles. Despite the inherent limitations of each technique, their integration provides emergency physicians with real-time information, with potential benefits on clinical outcomes and resource utilization. This review aims to outline the pathophysiological rationale for adopting non-invasive monitoring in the ED and to critically evaluate the advantages and limitations of each technique, providing emergency physicians with a concise framework to guide clinical practice.
KW - emergency medicine
KW - fluid responsiveness
KW - hemodynamic monitoring
KW - non-invasive cardiac output measurement
KW - shock resuscitation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105019201241
U2 - 10.3390/jcm14197002
DO - 10.3390/jcm14197002
M3 - Review article
SN - 2077-0383
VL - 14
JO - Journal of Clinical Medicine
JF - Journal of Clinical Medicine
IS - 19
M1 - 7002
ER -