TY - JOUR
T1 - Multicentre clinical radiotherapy audit in rectal cancer
T2 - Results of the IROCA project
AU - Fundowicz, Magdalena
AU - Aguiar, Artur
AU - De Castro, Carla Lopes
AU - Torras, Maria Glòria
AU - Deantonio, Letizia
AU - Konstanty, Ewelina
AU - Kruszyna-Mochalska, Marta
AU - MacIa, Miquel
AU - Canals, Eugeni
AU - Caro, Monica
AU - Pisani, Carla
AU - Zwierzchowska, Dorota
AU - Molero, Jaume
AU - Eraso, Arantxa
AU - Lencart, Joana
AU - Muñoz-Montplet, Carles
AU - Carvalho, Luisa
AU - Krengli, Marco
AU - Malicki, Julian
AU - Guedea, Ferran
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s).
PY - 2020/8/27
Y1 - 2020/8/27
N2 - Purpose: To perform a clinical audit to assess adherence to standard clinical practice for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients undergoing radiotherapy for rectal cancer treatment in four European countries. Materials and methods: Multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study of 221 patients treated for rectal cancer in 2015 at six European cancer centres. Clinical indicators applicable to general radiotherapy processes were evaluated. All data were obtained from electronic medical records. Results: The audits were performed in the year 2017. We found substantial inter-centre variability in adherence to standard clinical practices: 1) presentation of cases at departmental clinical sessions (range, 0-100%) or multidisciplinary tumour board (50-95%); 2) pretreatment MRI (61.5-100%) and thoracoabdominal CT (15.0-100%). Large inter-centre differences were observed in the mean interval between biopsy and first visit to the radiotherapy department (range, 21.6-58.6 days) and between the first visit and start of treatment (15.1-38.8 days). Treatment interruptions ≥ 1 day occurred in 43.9% (2.5-90%) of cases overall. Treatment compensation was performed in 2.1% of cases. Treatment was completed in the prescribed time in 55.7% of cases. Conclusions: This multi-institutional clinical audit revealed that most centres adhered to standard clinical practices for most of the radiotherapy processes-related variables assessed. However, the audit revealed marked inter-centre variability for certain quality indicators, particularly inconsistent record keeping. Multiple targets for improvement and/or harmonisation were identified, confirming the value of routine clinical audits to detect potential deviations from standard clinical practice.
AB - Purpose: To perform a clinical audit to assess adherence to standard clinical practice for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients undergoing radiotherapy for rectal cancer treatment in four European countries. Materials and methods: Multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study of 221 patients treated for rectal cancer in 2015 at six European cancer centres. Clinical indicators applicable to general radiotherapy processes were evaluated. All data were obtained from electronic medical records. Results: The audits were performed in the year 2017. We found substantial inter-centre variability in adherence to standard clinical practices: 1) presentation of cases at departmental clinical sessions (range, 0-100%) or multidisciplinary tumour board (50-95%); 2) pretreatment MRI (61.5-100%) and thoracoabdominal CT (15.0-100%). Large inter-centre differences were observed in the mean interval between biopsy and first visit to the radiotherapy department (range, 21.6-58.6 days) and between the first visit and start of treatment (15.1-38.8 days). Treatment interruptions ≥ 1 day occurred in 43.9% (2.5-90%) of cases overall. Treatment compensation was performed in 2.1% of cases. Treatment was completed in the prescribed time in 55.7% of cases. Conclusions: This multi-institutional clinical audit revealed that most centres adhered to standard clinical practices for most of the radiotherapy processes-related variables assessed. However, the audit revealed marked inter-centre variability for certain quality indicators, particularly inconsistent record keeping. Multiple targets for improvement and/or harmonisation were identified, confirming the value of routine clinical audits to detect potential deviations from standard clinical practice.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090010104&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s13014-020-01648-7
DO - 10.1186/s13014-020-01648-7
M3 - Review article
SN - 1748-717X
VL - 15
JO - Radiation Oncology
JF - Radiation Oncology
IS - 1
M1 - 208
ER -