Minimally invasive versus open liver resection for nonmetastatic hepatocellular carcinoma staged BCLC – B and – C: an Italian multicentric analysis

Gianluca Cassese, Mariano C. Giglio, Alessandro Vitale, Andrea Lauterio, Matteo Serenari, Federica Cipriani, Francesco Ardito, Pasquale Perri, Daniele Nicolini, Giulio Di Gioia, Andrea Pierluigi Fontana, Quirino Lai, Simone Conci, Luca Fumagalli, Maurizio Iaria, Mattia Garancini, Sarah Molfino, Matteo Zanello, Giuliano La Barba, Maria ConticchioPaola Germani, Simone Famularo, Maurizio Romano, Giuseppe Zimmitti, Michela De Angelis, Albert Troci, Andrea Belli, Francesco Izzo, Michele Crespi, Luigi Boccia, Mohamed Abu Hilal, Giacomo Zanus, Guido Torzilli, Paola Tarchi, Riccardo Memeo, Giorgio Ercolani, Elio Jovine, Gianluca Baiocchi, Fabrizio Romano, Raffaele Della Valle, Marco Chiarelli, Andrea Ruzzenente, Massimo Rossi, Alessandro Ferrero, Marcello Maestri, Marco Vivarelli, Gian Luca Grazi, Felice Giuliante, Luca Aldrighetti, Matteo Cescon, Luciano De Carlis, Umberto Cillo, Roberto I. Troisi, Roberto Montalti, Pierluigi Romano, Riccardo D. Carlis, Matteo Ravaioli, Francesca Ratti, Francesco Razionale, Andrea Oddi, Laura Marinelli, Ottavia Cicerone, Nadia Russolillo, Zoe Larghi Laureiro, Ivan Marchitelli, Alessia Malagnino, Mario Giuffrida, Mauro Alessandro Scotti, Cristina Ciulli, Valentina Ferraro, Alessandro Cucchetti, Annachiara Casella, Davide Cosola, Matteo Donadon, Patrizia Pelizzo, Alberto Manzoni, Guido Mantovani, Francesco Cammarata, Renato Patrone

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo su rivistaArticolo in rivistapeer review

Abstract

Background: Recent papers report significant survival gain after liver resection in BCLC-B and -C HCC patients. The results of minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) in such patients have not been widely investigated so far. Methods: Data regarding patients undergoing MILS or open liver resection (OLR) for HCC staged BCLC -B and -C were extracted from the HERCOLES database. An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was adopted to balance the confounders. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint including post-hepatectomy liver failure, severe postoperative complications and in-hospital mortality. Results: 627 patients were included (459 undergoing OLR and 168 receiving MILS). After IPTW, no difference was found in the composite endpoint between MILS and OLR (OR 0.86 [95%CI 0.46-1-60]; p = 0.62). MILS reduced the risk of receiving intra-operative transfusions (OR 0.28 [95%CI 0.13-0.58]; p < 0.001) and of developing postoperative ascites (OR 0.56 [95%CI 0,32-0,98]; p = 0.039), with reduced length of stay (OR 0.82 [95%CI 0.66-1.01]; p = 0.045). The survival analysis showed no differences between MILS and OLR for both OS (p = 0.13) and DFS (p = 0.491). Conclusion: MILS was shown to be safe and feasible for selected non-metastatic HCC patients staged BCLC B and C, reducing the risk of perioperative transfusions and postoperative ascites, and shortening the length of stay.

Lingua originaleInglese
pagine (da-a)649-659
Numero di pagine11
RivistaHPB
Volume27
Numero di pubblicazione5
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - mag 2025
Pubblicato esternamente

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Minimally invasive versus open liver resection for nonmetastatic hepatocellular carcinoma staged BCLC – B and – C: an Italian multicentric analysis'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo