Abstract
The article analyses the “hermeneutical rereading of the ontological argument” proposed by Furia Valori and in this regard it inquires into, on one side and also with reference to Virgilio Melchiorre’s position, the articulation of the relationship between metaphysics and hermeneutics and it examines, on the other side and with reference to Luigi Pareyson’s perspective, if the original principle has to be understood as libera necessitas or absolute freedom. The article analyses then the intercultural hermeneutics proposed by Maurizio Pagano and in this respect it underlines, on one side, how the conditions of the dialogue are – in the wake of Pareyson – the truth and the otherness and it examines, on the other side, how the “universal concrete” and the “relational unity” (proposed by Pagano) can be related with the theme of the christic prolepsis between history and eschaton and with the question of the analogy between finite and infinite.
Lingua originale | Italian |
---|---|
pagine (da-a) | 403-410 |
Numero di pagine | 8 |
Rivista | GIORNALE DI METAFISICA |
Volume | XLII |
Numero di pubblicazione | 2 |
Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 1 gen 2020 |
Keywords
- Metaphysics
- Hermeneutics
- Freedom
- Intercultural Dialogue
- Analogy