TY - JOUR
T1 - Menopausal hormone therapy and risk of ovarian cancer in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition
AU - Tsilidis, Konstantinos K.
AU - Allen, Naomi E.
AU - Key, Timothy J.
AU - Dossus, Laure
AU - Kaaks, Rudolf
AU - Bakken, Kjersti
AU - Lund, Eiliv
AU - Fournier, Agnès
AU - Dahm, Christina C.
AU - Overvad, Kim
AU - Hansen, Louise
AU - Tjønneland, Anne
AU - Rinaldi, Sabina
AU - Romieu, Isabelle
AU - Boutron-Ruault, Marie Christine
AU - Clavel-Chapelon, Francoise
AU - Lukanova, Annekatrin
AU - Boeing, Heiner
AU - Schütze, Madlen
AU - Benetou, Vassiliki
AU - Palli, Domenico
AU - Berrino, Franco
AU - Galasso, Rocco
AU - Tumino, Rosario
AU - Sacerdote, Carlotta
AU - Bueno-De-Mesquita, H. Bas
AU - Van Duijnhoven, Fränzel J.B.
AU - Braem, Marieke G.M.
AU - Onland-Moret, N. Charlotte
AU - Gram, Inger T.
AU - Rodríguez, Laudina
AU - Duell, Eric J.
AU - Sánchez, María José
AU - Huerta, José María
AU - Ardanaz, Eva
AU - Amiano, Pilar
AU - Khaw, Kay Tee
AU - Wareham, Nick
AU - Riboli, Elio
PY - 2011/8
Y1 - 2011/8
N2 - The association between menopausal hormone therapy (HT) and risk of ovarian cancer was assessed among 126,920 post-menopausal women recruited into the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. After an average of 9-year follow-up, 424 incident ovarian cancers were diagnosed. Cox models adjusted for body mass index, smoking status, unilateral ovariectomy, simple hysterectomy, age at menarche, number of full-term pregnancies, and duration of oral contraceptives were used. Compared with baseline never use, current use of any HT was positively associated with risk (HR [hazard ratio], 1.29; 95% CI [confidence interval], 1.01-1.65), while former use was not (HR, 0.96; 9 % CI, 0.70-1.30). Current estrogen-only HT was associated with a 63% higher risk (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.08-2.47), while current estrogen plus progestin was associated with a smaller and non-significant higher risk (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.89-1.62). Use of tibolone was associated with a twofold greater risk (HR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.06-4.50), but was based on small numbers. In conclusion, women who currently use HT have a moderate increased risk of ovarian cancer, and which may be stronger for estrogen-only than estrogen plus progestin preparations.
AB - The association between menopausal hormone therapy (HT) and risk of ovarian cancer was assessed among 126,920 post-menopausal women recruited into the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. After an average of 9-year follow-up, 424 incident ovarian cancers were diagnosed. Cox models adjusted for body mass index, smoking status, unilateral ovariectomy, simple hysterectomy, age at menarche, number of full-term pregnancies, and duration of oral contraceptives were used. Compared with baseline never use, current use of any HT was positively associated with risk (HR [hazard ratio], 1.29; 95% CI [confidence interval], 1.01-1.65), while former use was not (HR, 0.96; 9 % CI, 0.70-1.30). Current estrogen-only HT was associated with a 63% higher risk (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.08-2.47), while current estrogen plus progestin was associated with a smaller and non-significant higher risk (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.89-1.62). Use of tibolone was associated with a twofold greater risk (HR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.06-4.50), but was based on small numbers. In conclusion, women who currently use HT have a moderate increased risk of ovarian cancer, and which may be stronger for estrogen-only than estrogen plus progestin preparations.
KW - Cohort study
KW - Hormone replacement therapy
KW - Ovarian cancer
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/82955203704
U2 - 10.1007/s10552-011-9782-z
DO - 10.1007/s10552-011-9782-z
M3 - Article
SN - 0957-5243
VL - 22
SP - 1075
EP - 1084
JO - Cancer Causes and Control
JF - Cancer Causes and Control
IS - 8
ER -