TY - JOUR
T1 - Management of patients explanted for implantable cardioverter defibrillator infections
T2 - Bridge therapy with external temporary ICD
AU - Dell'Era, Gabriele
AU - Prenna, Eleonora
AU - Ziacchi, Matteo
AU - Diemberger, Igor
AU - Varalda, Marco
AU - Guerra, Federico
AU - Biffi, Mauro
AU - Occhetta, Eraldo
AU - Patti, Giuseppe
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - Aims and methods: In case of cardiacimplantable electronicdevice (CIED)-related infections, it is mandatory to completely remove the device and administer prolonged antibiotic therapy. The management of patients explanted for an implantable defibrillator (ICD) infection is complex especially in patients needing anti-bradycardia pacing or tachyarrhythmia protection. We tested the efficacy and safety of a conventional ICD externally connected to a transvenous dual-coil lead as bridging therapy before the reimplant, comparing outcomes with a historical cohort of patients (N = 113) treated with temporary transvenous pacing. We enrolled 18 patients explanted for ICD infection and needing prolonged antibiotic therapy in three high-volume Italian centers. They received an external ICD stand-by for a mean of 16.5 (4–30) days before the reimplant. Results: No patient experienced malfunction of the system, with a significant reduction of this complication versus temporary transfemoral pacing (37%, p =.004). Post-procedural occurrence of other complications (infection, relevant local bleeding, ventricular tachycardia during insertion of the lead, cardiac perforation, and venous thromboembolism) was low and not different in the two groups. One patient experienced an electrical storm, effectively recognized by the external ICD and treated with anti-tachycardia pacings (ATPs) and shocks. Conclusions: An approach with an external ICD seems to be a safe and viable option as bridging therapy in patients requiring ICD explant for CIED infection.
AB - Aims and methods: In case of cardiacimplantable electronicdevice (CIED)-related infections, it is mandatory to completely remove the device and administer prolonged antibiotic therapy. The management of patients explanted for an implantable defibrillator (ICD) infection is complex especially in patients needing anti-bradycardia pacing or tachyarrhythmia protection. We tested the efficacy and safety of a conventional ICD externally connected to a transvenous dual-coil lead as bridging therapy before the reimplant, comparing outcomes with a historical cohort of patients (N = 113) treated with temporary transvenous pacing. We enrolled 18 patients explanted for ICD infection and needing prolonged antibiotic therapy in three high-volume Italian centers. They received an external ICD stand-by for a mean of 16.5 (4–30) days before the reimplant. Results: No patient experienced malfunction of the system, with a significant reduction of this complication versus temporary transfemoral pacing (37%, p =.004). Post-procedural occurrence of other complications (infection, relevant local bleeding, ventricular tachycardia during insertion of the lead, cardiac perforation, and venous thromboembolism) was low and not different in the two groups. One patient experienced an electrical storm, effectively recognized by the external ICD and treated with anti-tachycardia pacings (ATPs) and shocks. Conclusions: An approach with an external ICD seems to be a safe and viable option as bridging therapy in patients requiring ICD explant for CIED infection.
KW - cardiac device infection
KW - cardiac implantable electronic device
KW - temporary external ICD
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115070434&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/pace.14355
DO - 10.1111/pace.14355
M3 - Article
SN - 0147-8389
VL - 44
SP - 1884
EP - 1889
JO - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
JF - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
IS - 11
ER -