TY - JOUR
T1 - Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog therapy of uterine fibroid
T2 - analysis of results obtained with buserelin administered intranasally and goserelin administered subcutaneously as a monthly depot
AU - Costantini, Sergio
AU - Anserini, Paola
AU - Valenzano, Mario
AU - Remorgida, Valentino
AU - Venturini, Pier Luigi
AU - De Cecco, Luigi
PY - 1990/10
Y1 - 1990/10
N2 - From January 1987 to February 1988 patients affected by uterine fibroid were offered medical treatment with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogs as an alternative to surgery. The aim was to compare results obtained with two different analog formulations. 42 patients were randomly assigned to receive either intranasal buserelin, preceded by a short period of subcutaneous injections (500 μg thrice daily for 10 days) or subcutaneous goserelin. Treatment was always started in the luteal phase. Response to therapy was evaluated through periodic clinic, endocrine and echotomographic controls. There were no significative differences in fibroid reduction between the two treatment groups. After 6 months of treatment, a fibroid reduction of more than 30% of the initial volume was observed in 16 patients in the buserelin group and in 18 patients in the goserelin group. The fibroid regrowth observed in all patients during the follow-up period severely limits the usefulness of this medical approach to selected clinical cases.
AB - From January 1987 to February 1988 patients affected by uterine fibroid were offered medical treatment with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogs as an alternative to surgery. The aim was to compare results obtained with two different analog formulations. 42 patients were randomly assigned to receive either intranasal buserelin, preceded by a short period of subcutaneous injections (500 μg thrice daily for 10 days) or subcutaneous goserelin. Treatment was always started in the luteal phase. Response to therapy was evaluated through periodic clinic, endocrine and echotomographic controls. There were no significative differences in fibroid reduction between the two treatment groups. After 6 months of treatment, a fibroid reduction of more than 30% of the initial volume was observed in 16 patients in the buserelin group and in 18 patients in the goserelin group. The fibroid regrowth observed in all patients during the follow-up period severely limits the usefulness of this medical approach to selected clinical cases.
KW - LHRH-analog
KW - Leiomyoma/uterine neoplasm
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025312748&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0028-2243(90)90096-J
DO - 10.1016/0028-2243(90)90096-J
M3 - Article
SN - 0028-2243
VL - 37
SP - 63
EP - 69
JO - European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
JF - European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
IS - 1
ER -