TY - JOUR
T1 - Lipodystrophy Severity Score to Assess Disease Burden in Lipodystrophy
AU - Brown, Rebecca J.
AU - Akinci, Baris
AU - Yosef, Matheos
AU - Phillips, Helen
AU - Khalatbari, Shokoufeh
AU - Sorkina, Ekaterina
AU - Santini, Ferruccio
AU - Vigouroux, Corinne
AU - Brush, Maiah
AU - Meral, Rasimcan
AU - Ceccarini, Giovanni
AU - Zeybel, Mujdat
AU - Prodam, Flavia
AU - Von Schnurbein, Julia
AU - Sorice, Gian P.
AU - Guler, Merve C.
AU - Patni, Nivedita
AU - Tanrikulu, Seher
AU - Alyaarubi, Saif
AU - Ozgen, Basak S.
AU - Foss-Freitas, Maria C.
AU - Ozisik, Secil
AU - Segrestin, Benerice
AU - Ozcan, Busra
AU - Adiyaman, Suleyman C.
AU - Musolino, Gianluca
AU - Sekizkardes, Hilal
AU - Musso, Carla
AU - Lebenthal, Yael
AU - Ozen, Samim
AU - Simha, Vinaya
AU - Simsir, Ilgin Y.
AU - Stears, Anna
AU - Scherer, Thomas
AU - Gambineri, Alessandra
AU - Lima, Josivan G.
AU - Semple, Robert
AU - Wabitsch, Martin
AU - Araujo-Vilar, David
AU - Hegele, Robert A.
AU - Oral, Elif A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society 2025.
PY - 2025/11/1
Y1 - 2025/11/1
N2 - Context: Lipodystrophy syndromes are rare disorders characterized by deficient adipose tissue, leading to insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and organ system abnormalities. Objective: Our goal was to develop a lipodystrophy severity score (LDS) to holistically capture the diverse manifestations of lipodystrophy into a numerical score to aid in prediction of clinical outcomes and/or treatment impact. Design: An 8-domain LDS was developed by 8 disease experts in consultation with patient organizations. The LDS was rated for feasibility and content validity by 28 additional clinicians and 9 patient representatives. LDS was compared to the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of severity for 20 putative patient profiles, each at 2 different time points, and by comparing change in LDS to global impression of change. For external validation, LDS was calculated in 2 cohorts of patients with lipodystrophy treated with metreleptin. Results: LDS domains include Diabetes/Insulin Resistance, Microvascular Complications of Diabetes, Lipids, Cardiovascular, Liver, Kidney, Reproductive, and Other. Each domain is assessed by 1 or more questions assessing both lifetime and recent complications of lipodystrophy. The LDS had high content validity and feasibility and high reliability by intraclass correlation coefficients (>0.95). Global and domain-specific LDS were strongly correlated with CGI, as were changes in scores across visits (R = 0.79-0.99, P < .001 for all). In generalized lipodystrophy, metreleptin significantly reduced LDS (from 46 to 26 at 12 months, P < .001). The reductions were smaller in partial lipodystrophy (from 65 to 61 at 12 months, P = .04). Conclusion: The LDS can reflect the severity of diverse manifestations of lipodystrophy and monitor changes following interventions.
AB - Context: Lipodystrophy syndromes are rare disorders characterized by deficient adipose tissue, leading to insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and organ system abnormalities. Objective: Our goal was to develop a lipodystrophy severity score (LDS) to holistically capture the diverse manifestations of lipodystrophy into a numerical score to aid in prediction of clinical outcomes and/or treatment impact. Design: An 8-domain LDS was developed by 8 disease experts in consultation with patient organizations. The LDS was rated for feasibility and content validity by 28 additional clinicians and 9 patient representatives. LDS was compared to the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of severity for 20 putative patient profiles, each at 2 different time points, and by comparing change in LDS to global impression of change. For external validation, LDS was calculated in 2 cohorts of patients with lipodystrophy treated with metreleptin. Results: LDS domains include Diabetes/Insulin Resistance, Microvascular Complications of Diabetes, Lipids, Cardiovascular, Liver, Kidney, Reproductive, and Other. Each domain is assessed by 1 or more questions assessing both lifetime and recent complications of lipodystrophy. The LDS had high content validity and feasibility and high reliability by intraclass correlation coefficients (>0.95). Global and domain-specific LDS were strongly correlated with CGI, as were changes in scores across visits (R = 0.79-0.99, P < .001 for all). In generalized lipodystrophy, metreleptin significantly reduced LDS (from 46 to 26 at 12 months, P < .001). The reductions were smaller in partial lipodystrophy (from 65 to 61 at 12 months, P = .04). Conclusion: The LDS can reflect the severity of diverse manifestations of lipodystrophy and monitor changes following interventions.
KW - clinical events
KW - comorbidities
KW - complications
KW - disease burden
KW - lipodystrophy
KW - metabolic disease
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105018926383
U2 - 10.1210/clinem/dgaf103
DO - 10.1210/clinem/dgaf103
M3 - Article
SN - 0021-972X
VL - 110
SP - 3243
EP - 3255
JO - Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
JF - Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
IS - 11
ER -