Abstract
Background: The optimal timing for early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) in patients with acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) is still controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of ELC in patients with delayed presentation. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 381 patients who underwent ELC for ACC between January 2010 and September 2018. Included patients were classified into two groups according to the timing of surgery from the onset of symptoms: group 1 (G1) within the first 7 days and group 2 (G2) beyond 7 days. Results: There were no significant differences regarding conversion rate (G1 8.6% vs. G2 11.8%; p = 0.527), operative time (G1 100 min [75–120] vs. G2 120 min [71–150]; p = 0.060), bile duct injuries (G1 0.3% vs. G2 0%; p = 1), major postoperative complications (G1 11% vs. G2 5.9%; p = 0.557), reoperation rates (G1 1.4% vs. G2 0%; p = 1), length of stay (G1 4 days [3–7] vs. G2 5 days [3–7]; p = 0.539), readmissions (G1 3.7% vs. G2 5.9%; p = 0.633) and costs (G1 6035 € [3693–8330] vs. G2 7243 € [4921–11,336]; p = 0.395). Conclusion: ELC may be considered for patients with ACC who can tolerate surgery with more than 1 week of symptom duration.
| Lingua originale | Inglese |
|---|---|
| pagine (da-a) | 1827-1832 |
| Numero di pagine | 6 |
| Rivista | Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery |
| Volume | 24 |
| Numero di pubblicazione | 8 |
| DOI | |
| Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 1 ago 2020 |
| Pubblicato esternamente | Sì |
Fingerprint
Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: Is the Surgery Still Safe beyond the 7-Day Barrier?'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.Cita questo
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver