IRON: A retrospective international multicenter study on robotic versus laparoscopic versus open approach in gallbladder cancer

Benedetto Ielpo, Maria Vittoria d'Addetta, Simone Cremona, Mauro Podda, MARCELLO DI MARTINO, Gregorio Di Franco, Niccoló Furbetta, Annalisa Comandatore, Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti, Luca Morelli, Benedetto Ielpo, Maria Vittoria d'Addetta, Fernando Burdio, Patricia Sanchez-Velazquez, Gemma Vellalta, Simone Cremona, Maria Villamonte, Luca Morelli, Niccoló Furbetta, Gregorio Di FrancoAnnalisa Comandatore, Mattia Mastrangelo, Chiara Mazzone, Michele Masetti, Maria Fortuna Offi, Eleonora Geraldi, Luca Aldrighetti, Sara Ingallinella, Francesca Ratti, Edoardo Rosso, Vito De Blasi, Alessandro Anselmo, Luigi Eduardo Conte, Riccardo Memeo, Antonella Delvecchio, Iswanto Sukandy, Luca Moraldi, Gian Luca Grazi, Marcello G. Spampinato, Stefano D'Ugo, Adrian Kah Heng Chiow, Francis Zheng Yi Yee, Hiang Jin Tan, Nita Thiruchelvam, Francesco Lancellotti, Thomas Satyadas, Massimo Fedi, Rosita De Vincenti, Francesca Leo, Benedetta Pesi, Andrea Belli, Francesco Izzo, Carmen Cutolo, Fabrizio Romano, Mauro Alessandro Scotti, Francesca Carissimi, Mattia Garancini, Cristina Ciulli, Michele Mazzola, Giovanni Ferrari, Andrea Zironda, Alessandro Giani, Giuseppe Giuliani, Maria Pia Federica Dorma, Francesco Guerra, Michele Di Marino, Andrea Coratti, Elisa Mina, Andrea Romanzi, Mikel Prieto, Arkaitz Perfecto, Orestis Ioannidis, Odysseas Lombardeas, Francesco Ardito, Felice Giuliante, Victor Lopez-Lopez, Ricardo Robles-Campos, John Martinie, Frances Mccarron, Raffaele Romito, Filadelfio Massimiliano Nicolosi, Anis Ben Dhaou, Atef Chamekh, Bochra Rezgui, Mario Pacilli, Giovanna Pavone, Nicola Tartaglia, Rahul Gupta, Davide Giovanni Grego, Claudio Ricci, Francesco Pata, Bruno Nardo, Helena Facundo, Oscar Guevara, Dario Lorenzin, Alfredo Guglielmi, Andrea Ruzzenente, Valentina Valle, Mangano Alberto, PierCristoforo Giulianotti, Emilio Vicente, Valentina Ferri, Pasquale Avella, Fulvio Calise, Aldo Rocca, Paolo Bianchi, Gianluca Rompianesi, Roberto I. Troisi, Matteo Davide DONADON, MARCELLO DI MARTINO, Mauro Podda, Adolfo Pisanu, Guido Torzilli

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo su rivistaArticolo in rivistapeer review

Abstract

Objective: For patients with T1b gallbladder cancer or greater, an adequate lymphadenectomy should include at least 6 nodes. Studies comparing short- and long-term outcomes of the open approach with those of laparoscopy and robotic approaches are limited, with small sample sizes, and there are none comparing laparoscopic and robotic approaches. This study compared patients who underwent robotic, laparoscopic, and open resection of gallbladder cancer, evaluating short- and long-term outcomes. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of patients with T1b gallbladder cancer or greater (excluding combined organ resection and T4) who underwent open, laparoscopic, and robotic liver resection and lymphadenectomy between January 2012 and December 2022. The 3 groups were matched in terms of patient baseline and disease characteristics based on propensity score matching, comparing robotic with open and robotic with laparoscopic groups. Results: We enrolled 575 patients from 37 institutions. After propensity score matching, the median number of harvested nodes was higher in the robotic group than in the open (7 vs 5; P =.0150) and laparoscopic groups (7 vs 4; P <.001). The Pringle maneuver time was shorter with robotic resection than with laparoscopy (38 vs 59 minutes; P =.0034), and the robotic group also had a lower conversion rate (3% vs 14%, respectively; P =.005) and less estimated blood loss than open and laparoscopic resections. The perioperative morbidity and mortality rates did not differ. The robotic and laparoscopic approaches were associated with faster functional recovery than the open group. In the multivariate analysis, the factors related to the retrieval of at least 6 nodes were the robotic approach over open (odds ratio, 5.1529) and over laparoscopy (odds ratio, 6.7289) and the center experience (≥20 minimally invasive liver resections/year) (odds ratio, 4.962). After a mean follow-up of 42.6 months, overall survival and disease-free survival were not different between groups. Conclusion: Compared with open and laparoscopic surgeries, the robotic approach for gallbladder cancer performed in a center with appropriate experience in minimally invasive surgery can provide adequate node retrieval.
Lingua originaleInglese
pagine (da-a)1008-1015
Numero di pagine8
RivistaSurgery
Volume176
Numero di pubblicazione4
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2024

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'IRON: A retrospective international multicenter study on robotic versus laparoscopic versus open approach in gallbladder cancer'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo