Intracoronary adjunctive therapies for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a network meta-analysis of trials

  • Renzo Laborante
  • , Emiliano Bianchini
  • , Giuseppe Ciliberti
  • , Donato Antonio Paglianiti
  • , Simone Filomia
  • , Francesco Bianchini
  • , Mattia Galli
  • , Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai
  • , Patrick W Serruys
  • , Filippo Crea
  • , Giuseppe Rocco Salvatore Patti
  • , Gianluigi Savarese
  • , Carlo Trani
  • , Francesco Burzotta
  • , DOMENICO D'AMARIO

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo su rivistaArticolo in rivistapeer review

Abstract

Aims: This network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluates the comparative safety and efficacy of intra-coronary (IC) pharmacological and procedural treatments - on top of balloon angioplasty and stent placement - on clinical outcomes and surrogate endpoints of coronary microvascular obstruction (CMVO) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods and results: Two electronic databases were searched for eligible studies. Primary efficacy endpoints included all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and heart failure (HF) hospitalization. Primary safety endpoints included peri-procedural arrhythmias including atrioventricular blocks (AVBs) and ventricular fibrillation/sustained ventricular tachycardia (VF/SVT), any bleeding, and stroke. Secondary efficacy endpoints included the occurrence of post-procedural thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade 0-2 and ST-segment resolution.A total of 64 RCTs involving 27,243 patients were included. In mixed comparisons, no treatment significantly reduced the incidence of primary efficacy endpoints compared to conventional primary PCI during a mean follow-up of 8 months. Several treatments significantly reduced the occurrence of post-PCI TIMI 0-2 flow grade [adenosine: 0.40 (odds ratio), (95% Confidence Interval 0.24-0.68); verapamil: 0.22 (0.07-0.69); tirofiban:0.43 (0.27-0.71); manual thrombus aspiration (TA): 0.61 (0.45-0.82); fibrinolytic + manual TA: 0.24 (0.12-0.48); tirofiban + manual TA: 0.32 (0.14-0.75)], compared to conventional primary PCI. IC administration of tirofiban increased the risk of any bleeding [incidence rate ratio: 1.65 (1.11-2.45)], while IC adenosine increased the risk of peri-procedural AVBs [OR: 2.80 (1.14-6.84)].Nicorandil reduced the incidence of peri-procedural VF/SVT [OR: 0.31 (0.12-0.81)]. Conclusions: Adjunctive IC treatments during primary PCI do not influence hard clinical outcomes compared to conventional therapy within a mean 8-month follow-up, although several of them lead to an improvement in surrogate endpoints of CMVO.
Lingua originaleInglese
RivistaEuropean Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2025

Keywords

  • ST-elevation myocardial infarction
  • adjunctive therapies
  • coronary microvascular obstruction
  • intra-coronary

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Intracoronary adjunctive therapies for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a network meta-analysis of trials'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo