TY - GEN
T1 - Integrating rule-based and case-based decision making in diabetic patient management
AU - Bellazzi, Riccardo
AU - Montani, Stefania
AU - Portinale, Luigi
AU - Riva, Alberto
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999.
PY - 1999
Y1 - 1999
N2 - The integration of rule-based and case-based reasoning is particularly useful in medical applications, where both general rules and specific patient cases are usually available. In the present paper we aim at presenting a decision support tool for Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus management relying on such a kind of integration. This multi-modal reasoning system aims at providing physicians with a suitable solution to the problem of therapy planning by exploiting, in the most flexible way, the strengths of the two selected methods. In particular, the integration is pursued without considering one of the modality as the most prominent reasoning method, but exploiting complementarity in all possible ways. In fact, while rules provide suggestions on the basis of a situation detection mechanism that relies on structured prior knowledge, CBR may be used to specialize and dynamically adapt the rules on the basis of the patient’s characteristics and of the accumulated experience. On the other hand, if a particular patient class is not sufficiently covered by cases, the use of rules may be exploited to try to learn suitable situations, in order to improve the competence of the case-based component. Such a work will be integrated in the EU funded project T-IDDM architecture, and has been preliminary tested on a set of cases generated by a diabetic patient simulator.
AB - The integration of rule-based and case-based reasoning is particularly useful in medical applications, where both general rules and specific patient cases are usually available. In the present paper we aim at presenting a decision support tool for Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus management relying on such a kind of integration. This multi-modal reasoning system aims at providing physicians with a suitable solution to the problem of therapy planning by exploiting, in the most flexible way, the strengths of the two selected methods. In particular, the integration is pursued without considering one of the modality as the most prominent reasoning method, but exploiting complementarity in all possible ways. In fact, while rules provide suggestions on the basis of a situation detection mechanism that relies on structured prior knowledge, CBR may be used to specialize and dynamically adapt the rules on the basis of the patient’s characteristics and of the accumulated experience. On the other hand, if a particular patient class is not sufficiently covered by cases, the use of rules may be exploited to try to learn suitable situations, in order to improve the competence of the case-based component. Such a work will be integrated in the EU funded project T-IDDM architecture, and has been preliminary tested on a set of cases generated by a diabetic patient simulator.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=22944485370&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/3-540-48508-2_28
DO - 10.1007/3-540-48508-2_28
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:22944485370
SN - 3540662375
SN - 9783540662372
T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
SP - 386
EP - 400
BT - Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development - 3rd International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, ICCBR 1999, Proceedings
A2 - Althoff, Klaus-Dieter
A2 - Branting, L. Karl
A2 - Bergmann, Ralph
PB - Springer Verlag
T2 - 3rd International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, ICCBR 1999
Y2 - 27 July 1999 through 30 July 1999
ER -