Inequality and polarisation in health systems' responsiveness: A cross-country analysis

A. M. Jones, N. Rice, SILVANA MARIA ROBONE, P. Rosa Diaz

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo su rivistaArticolo in rivista

Abstract

The World Health Report 2000 proposed three fundamental goals for health systems encompassing population health, health care finance and health systems responsiveness. The goals incorporate both an efficiency and equity dimension. While inequalities in population health and health care finance have motivated two important strands of research, inequalities in responsiveness have received less attention in health economics. This paper examines inequality and polarisation in responsiveness, bridging this gap in the literature and contributing towards an integrated analysis of health systems performance. It uses data from the World Health Survey to measure and compare inequalities in responsiveness across 25 European countries. In order to respect the inherently ordinal nature of the responsiveness data, median-based measures of inequality and polarisation are employed. The results suggest that, in the face of wide differences in the health systems analysed, there exists large variability in inequality in responsiveness across countries.
Lingua originaleInglese
pagine (da-a)616-625
Numero di pagine10
RivistaJournal of Health Economics
Volume30
Numero di pubblicazione4
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2011

Keywords

  • Health systems' responsiveness
  • Ordered response data
  • Inequality
  • Polarisation

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Inequality and polarisation in health systems' responsiveness: A cross-country analysis'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo