TY - JOUR
T1 - Indagine sulle modalità di esecuzione delle biopsia renale in Piemonte e Valle d'Aosta.
AU - Manganaro, Marco
AU - Nebiolo, Pier Eugenio
AU - Rollino, Cristiana
AU - Giacchino, Franca
AU - Savoldi, Silvana
AU - Besso, Luca
AU - Colla, Loredana
AU - Amore, Alessandro
AU - Ferro, Michela
AU - Marazzi, Federico
AU - Chiarinotti, Doriana
AU - Guarnieri, Andrea
AU - Quaglia, Marco
AU - Manes, Massimo
AU - Vaccaro, Valentina
AU - Marcuccio, Cristina
AU - Licata, Carolina
AU - Patti, Rosaria
AU - Mariano, Filippo
AU - Bongi, Anna Maria
AU - Biamino, Ercole
AU - Boschetti, Maria Antonietta
AU - Della Volpe, Mario
AU - Malcangi, Ugo
AU - Baroni, Adriana
AU - Vagelli, Giuseppe
AU - Costantini, Luigia
AU - Salomone, Mario
AU - Formica, Marco
AU - Caramello, Elisa
AU - Campo, Andrea
AU - Pignone, Eugenia
AU - Messuerotti, Alessandra
AU - Roccatello, Dario
AU - Stratta, Piero
AU - Segoloni, Giuseppe
AU - Coppo, Rosanna
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - In 2010 a questionnaire was administered to the renal units of Piedmont and Valle d'Aosta to analyze their procedures for renal biopsy (RB). Seventy-eight percent of units performed RBs, 57% for more than 20 years, but only 43% performed at least 20 BRs per year. 20/21 units performed RB in an inpatient setting and 1/21 in day hospital with the patient remaining under observation the night after. Thirty-two percent did not consider a single kidney as a contraindication to RB, 59% considered it a relative contraindication and 9% considered it an absolute contraindication. In 90.5% of units there was a specific protocol for patient preparation for RB and 86% used a specific informed consent form. Ninety-five percent of units performed ultrasound-guided RB, 60% of them using needle guides attached to the probe. In 81% of units the left side was preferred; 71% put a pillow under the patient's abdomen. All units used disposable, automated or semi-automated needles. Needle size was 16G in 29%, 18G in 58%, and both 16G and 18G in 14% of units; 1 to 3 samples were drawn. One third of units had a microscope available for immediate evaluation of specimen adequacy. After RB, 86% of units kept patients in the prone position for 2-6 hours and all prescribed a period of bed rest (at least 24 hours in 90.5%). 90.5% of units followed a specific postbiopsy observation protocol consisting of blood pressure, heart rate and red blood cell measurements at different times, and urine monitoring and ultrasound control within 12-24 hours (only half of them also employing color Doppler). One third of all units discharged patients after 1 day and two thirds after 2-3 days; all prescribed abstention from effort and from antiplatelet drugs for 7-15 days. In 9 units both RB and tissue processing and examination were done in the same hospital, while 12 units sent the samples elsewhere. 76% obtained results in 2-4 days, 19% in 6-7 days, and 5% in 10-15 days. Less than 20% of the interviewed operators were fully familiar with the clauses of hospital insurance securing their activity. Use of RB is widespread in Piedmont and Valle d'Aosta but its practice shows variation between centers.
AB - In 2010 a questionnaire was administered to the renal units of Piedmont and Valle d'Aosta to analyze their procedures for renal biopsy (RB). Seventy-eight percent of units performed RBs, 57% for more than 20 years, but only 43% performed at least 20 BRs per year. 20/21 units performed RB in an inpatient setting and 1/21 in day hospital with the patient remaining under observation the night after. Thirty-two percent did not consider a single kidney as a contraindication to RB, 59% considered it a relative contraindication and 9% considered it an absolute contraindication. In 90.5% of units there was a specific protocol for patient preparation for RB and 86% used a specific informed consent form. Ninety-five percent of units performed ultrasound-guided RB, 60% of them using needle guides attached to the probe. In 81% of units the left side was preferred; 71% put a pillow under the patient's abdomen. All units used disposable, automated or semi-automated needles. Needle size was 16G in 29%, 18G in 58%, and both 16G and 18G in 14% of units; 1 to 3 samples were drawn. One third of units had a microscope available for immediate evaluation of specimen adequacy. After RB, 86% of units kept patients in the prone position for 2-6 hours and all prescribed a period of bed rest (at least 24 hours in 90.5%). 90.5% of units followed a specific postbiopsy observation protocol consisting of blood pressure, heart rate and red blood cell measurements at different times, and urine monitoring and ultrasound control within 12-24 hours (only half of them also employing color Doppler). One third of all units discharged patients after 1 day and two thirds after 2-3 days; all prescribed abstention from effort and from antiplatelet drugs for 7-15 days. In 9 units both RB and tissue processing and examination were done in the same hospital, while 12 units sent the samples elsewhere. 76% obtained results in 2-4 days, 19% in 6-7 days, and 5% in 10-15 days. Less than 20% of the interviewed operators were fully familiar with the clauses of hospital insurance securing their activity. Use of RB is widespread in Piedmont and Valle d'Aosta but its practice shows variation between centers.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871894364&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Articolo in rivista
SN - 0393-5590
VL - 29
SP - 621
EP - 627
JO - Giornale italiano di nefrologia : organo ufficiale della Società italiana di nefrologia
JF - Giornale italiano di nefrologia : organo ufficiale della Società italiana di nefrologia
IS - 5
ER -