Salta alla navigazione principale Salta alla ricerca Salta al contenuto principale

Impact of use of oral anticancer drugs on activity of Italian oncology practices: Results of a survey conducted by the Italian Society of Medical Oncology (AIOM)

  • Stefania Gori
  • , Massimo Di Maio
  • , Carmine Pinto
  • , Oscar Alabiso
  • , Editta Baldini
  • , Enrico Barbato
  • , Giordano Domenico Beretta
  • , Stefano Bravi
  • , Orazio Caffo
  • , Luciano Canobbio
  • , Francesco Carrozza
  • , Saverio Cinieri
  • , Giorgio Cruciani
  • , Angelo Dinota
  • , Vittorio Gebbia
  • , Lucio Giustini
  • , Claudio Graiff
  • , Annamaria Molino
  • , Antonio Muggiano
  • , Giuliano Pandoli
  • Fabio Puglisi, Pierosandro Tagliaferri, Silverio Tomao, Gianluigi Lunardi, Marco Venturini

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo su rivistaArticolo in rivistapeer review

Abstract

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: In recent years, the number of oral anticancer drugs used in clinical practice has rapidly increased. The Italian Society of Medical Oncology (AIOM) conducted a survey to describe the impact of the use of oral anticancer drugs on the daily activity of Italian oncology practices. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: A survey questionnaire was distributed to the coordinators of the regional sections of AIOM. A 6-month period was considered, from January 1, 2010 to June 30, 2010. The survey addressed (1) quantitative aspects of the use of oral anticancer drugs; (2) practical aspects in the management of patients treated with these drugs; (3) issues related to treatment costs and reimbursement procedures. RESULTS: Thirty-six questionnaires were received from institutions distributed throughout the Italian territory. Oral anticancer drugs (both chemotherapy and molecularly targeted agents) accounted for a significant proportion (17%) of prescribed treatments. Among the responding institutions, there were different dispensation procedures of oral drugs to patients: drugs were dispensed by the pharmacist (57%) or directly by the medical oncologist (23%) or nurse (20%). The medical oncologist played a major role in the communication with patients (73% alone and a further 24% in cooperation with other professional figures) and was the point of reference in the event of side effects in 97% of cases. In most cases, the reimbursement of drug costs was separated ("File F" procedure) from the flat fare received by the hospital for outpatient visits or day-hospital access. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal organization of oral anticancer treatment warrants the cooperation and integration of multiple professional figures. At least three figures are involved in patient management in the hospital: the medical oncologist, the nurse, and the hospital pharmacist. Oral anticancer treatments are associated with specific reimbursement issues: in the majority of cases, the cost of the drug is reimbursed separately from the cost of patient access.
Lingua originaleInglese
pagine (da-a)35-38
Numero di pagine4
RivistaTumori
Volume99
Numero di pubblicazione1
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2013
Pubblicato esternamente

OSS delle Nazioni Unite

Questo processo contribuisce al raggiungimento dei seguenti obiettivi di sviluppo sostenibile

  1. SDG 3 - Salute e benessere
    SDG 3 Salute e benessere

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Impact of use of oral anticancer drugs on activity of Italian oncology practices: Results of a survey conducted by the Italian Society of Medical Oncology (AIOM)'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo