TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of neck dissection in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas of unknown primary
AU - Abu-Shama, Yazan
AU - Salleron, Julia
AU - Carsuzaa, Florent
AU - Sun, Xu Shan
AU - Pflumio, Carole
AU - Troussier, Idriss
AU - Petit, Claire
AU - Caubet, Matthieu
AU - Beddok, Arnaud
AU - Calugaru, Valentin
AU - Servagi-Vernat, Stephanie
AU - Castelli, Joël
AU - Miroir, Jessica
AU - Krengli, Marco
AU - Giraud, Paul
AU - Romano, Edouard
AU - Khalifa, Jonathan
AU - Doré, Mélanie
AU - Blanchard, Nicolas
AU - Coutte, Alexandre
AU - Dupin, Charles
AU - Sumodhee, Shakeel
AU - Tao, Yungan
AU - Roth, Vincent
AU - Geoffrois, Lionel
AU - Toussaint, Bruno
AU - Nguyen, Duc Trung
AU - Faivre, Jean Christophe
AU - Thariat, Juliette
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2021/5/2
Y1 - 2021/5/2
N2 - Purpose: Management of head and neck cancers of unknown primary (HNCUP) combines neck dissection (ND) and radiotherapy, with or without chemotherapy. The prognostic value of ND has hardly been studied in HNCUP. Methods: A retrospective multicentric study assessed the impact of ND extent (adenectomy, selective ND, radical/radical-modified ND) on nodal relapse, progression-free survival (PFS) or survival, taking into account nodal stage. Results: 53 patients (16.5%) had no ND, 33 (10.2%) had lymphadenectomy, 116 (36.0%) underwent selective ND and 120 underwent radical/radical-modified ND (37.3%), 15 of which received radical ND (4.7%). With a 34-month median follow-up, the 3-year incidence of nodal relapse was 12.5% and progression-free survival (PFS) 69.1%. In multivariate analysis after adjusting for nodal stage, the risk of nodal relapse or progression was reduced with lymphadenectomy, selective or radical/modified ND, but survival rates were similar. Patients undergoing lymphadenectomy or ND had a better PFS and lowered nodal relapse incidence in the N1 + N2a group, but the improvement was not significant for the N2b or N2 + N3c patients. Severe toxicity rates exceeded 40% with radical ND. Conclusion: In HNCUP, ND improves PFS, regardless of nodal stage. The magnitude of the benefit of ND does not appear to depend on ND extent and decreases with a more advanced nodal stage.
AB - Purpose: Management of head and neck cancers of unknown primary (HNCUP) combines neck dissection (ND) and radiotherapy, with or without chemotherapy. The prognostic value of ND has hardly been studied in HNCUP. Methods: A retrospective multicentric study assessed the impact of ND extent (adenectomy, selective ND, radical/radical-modified ND) on nodal relapse, progression-free survival (PFS) or survival, taking into account nodal stage. Results: 53 patients (16.5%) had no ND, 33 (10.2%) had lymphadenectomy, 116 (36.0%) underwent selective ND and 120 underwent radical/radical-modified ND (37.3%), 15 of which received radical ND (4.7%). With a 34-month median follow-up, the 3-year incidence of nodal relapse was 12.5% and progression-free survival (PFS) 69.1%. In multivariate analysis after adjusting for nodal stage, the risk of nodal relapse or progression was reduced with lymphadenectomy, selective or radical/modified ND, but survival rates were similar. Patients undergoing lymphadenectomy or ND had a better PFS and lowered nodal relapse incidence in the N1 + N2a group, but the improvement was not significant for the N2b or N2 + N3c patients. Severe toxicity rates exceeded 40% with radical ND. Conclusion: In HNCUP, ND improves PFS, regardless of nodal stage. The magnitude of the benefit of ND does not appear to depend on ND extent and decreases with a more advanced nodal stage.
KW - Chemoradiotherapy
KW - Head and neck
KW - Neck dissection
KW - Neoplasms/cancers/carcinomas
KW - Prognosis
KW - Unknown primary
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105808684&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/cancers13102416
DO - 10.3390/cancers13102416
M3 - Article
SN - 2072-6694
VL - 13
JO - Cancers
JF - Cancers
IS - 10
M1 - 2416
ER -