TY - JOUR
T1 - Fructose liquid and solid formulations differently affect gut integrity, microbiota composition and related liver toxicity: a comparative in vivo study
AU - Mastrocola, Raffaella
AU - Ferrocino, Ilario
AU - Liberto, Erica
AU - CHIAZZA, FAUSTO
AU - CENTO, ALESSIA SOFIA
AU - COLLOTTA, DEBORA
AU - QUERIO, GIULIA
AU - Nigro, Debora
AU - BITONTO, VALERIA
AU - Cutrin, Juan Carlos
AU - Rantsiou, Kalliopi
AU - Durante, Mariaconcetta
AU - MASINI, Emanuela
AU - Aragno, Manuela
AU - Cordero, Chiara
AU - Cocolin, Luca
AU - Collino, Massimo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Despite clinical findings suggesting that the form (liquid versus solid) of the sugars may significantly affect the development of metabolic diseases, no
experimental data are available on the impact of their formulations on gut microbiota, integrity and hepatic outcomes.
In the present sudy, C57Bl/6j mice were fed a standard diet plus water (SD), a standard diet plus 60% fructose syrup (L-Fr) or a 60% fructose solid diet plus
water (S-Fr) for 12 weeks. Gut microbiota was characterized through 16S rRNA phylogenetic profiling and shotgun sequencing of microbial genes in ileum
content and related volatilome profiling.
Fructose feeding led to alterations of the gutmicrobiota depending on the fructose formulation,with increased colonization by Clostridium,Oscillospira and Clostridiales
phyla in the S-Fr group and Bacteroides, Lactobacillus, Lachnospiraceae and Dorea in the L-Fr. S-Fr evoked the highest accumulation of advanced glycation end products and
barrier injury in the ileum intestinal mucosa. These effects were associated to a stronger activation of the lipopolysaccharide-dependent proinflammatory TLR4/NLRP3
inflammasomepathway in the liver of S-Fr mice than of L-Fr mice. In contrast, L-Fr intake induced higher levels of hepatosteatosis andmarkers of fibrosis than S-Fr. Fructoseinduced
ex novo lipogenesis with production of SCFA and MCFA was confirmed by metagenomic analysis.
These results suggest that consumption of fructose under different forms, liquid or solid, may differently affect gut microbiota, thus leading to impairment in
intestinal mucosa integrity and liver homeostasis.
AB - Despite clinical findings suggesting that the form (liquid versus solid) of the sugars may significantly affect the development of metabolic diseases, no
experimental data are available on the impact of their formulations on gut microbiota, integrity and hepatic outcomes.
In the present sudy, C57Bl/6j mice were fed a standard diet plus water (SD), a standard diet plus 60% fructose syrup (L-Fr) or a 60% fructose solid diet plus
water (S-Fr) for 12 weeks. Gut microbiota was characterized through 16S rRNA phylogenetic profiling and shotgun sequencing of microbial genes in ileum
content and related volatilome profiling.
Fructose feeding led to alterations of the gutmicrobiota depending on the fructose formulation,with increased colonization by Clostridium,Oscillospira and Clostridiales
phyla in the S-Fr group and Bacteroides, Lactobacillus, Lachnospiraceae and Dorea in the L-Fr. S-Fr evoked the highest accumulation of advanced glycation end products and
barrier injury in the ileum intestinal mucosa. These effects were associated to a stronger activation of the lipopolysaccharide-dependent proinflammatory TLR4/NLRP3
inflammasomepathway in the liver of S-Fr mice than of L-Fr mice. In contrast, L-Fr intake induced higher levels of hepatosteatosis andmarkers of fibrosis than S-Fr. Fructoseinduced
ex novo lipogenesis with production of SCFA and MCFA was confirmed by metagenomic analysis.
These results suggest that consumption of fructose under different forms, liquid or solid, may differently affect gut microbiota, thus leading to impairment in
intestinal mucosa integrity and liver homeostasis.
KW - Advanced glycation end products
KW - Fecal volatilome
KW - Fructose
KW - Inflammasome
KW - Microbiota
KW - Advanced glycation end products
KW - Fecal volatilome
KW - Fructose
KW - Inflammasome
KW - Microbiota
UR - https://iris.uniupo.it/handle/11579/104563
U2 - 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2018.02.003
DO - 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2018.02.003
M3 - Article
SN - 0955-2863
VL - 55
SP - 185
EP - 199
JO - Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry
JF - Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry
ER -