TY - JOUR
T1 - Failure on voxilaprevir, velpatasvir, sofosbuvir and efficacy of rescue therapy
AU - HCV Virology Italian Resistance Network (VIRONET-C) collaborators
AU - Spanish GEHEP-004 Collaborators
AU - Members of the German HCV resistance study group
AU - Dietz, Julia
AU - Di Maio, Velia Chiara
AU - de Salazar, Adolfo
AU - Merino, Dolores
AU - Vermehren, Johannes
AU - Paolucci, Stefania
AU - Kremer, Andreas E.
AU - Lara, Magdalena
AU - Pardo, Maria Rodriguez
AU - Zoller, Heinz
AU - Degasperi, Elisabetta
AU - Peiffer, Kai Henrik
AU - Sighinolfi, Laura
AU - Téllez, Francisco
AU - Graf, Christiana
AU - Ghisetti, Valeria
AU - Schreiber, Jonas
AU - Fernández-Fuertes, Elisa
AU - Boglione, Lucio
AU - Muñoz-Medina, Leopoldo
AU - Stauber, Rudolf
AU - Gennari, William
AU - Figueruela, Blanca
AU - Santos, Jesús
AU - Lampertico, Pietro
AU - Zeuzem, Stefan
AU - Ceccherini-Silberstein, Francesca
AU - García, Federico
AU - Sarrazin, Christoph
AU - Aghemo, Alessio
AU - Allice, Tiziano
AU - Andreoni, Massimo
AU - Angelico, Mario
AU - Baldanti, Fausto
AU - Barbaliscia, Silvia
AU - Bertoli, Ada
AU - Borghi, Vanni
AU - Calvaruso, Vincenza
AU - Cariti, Giuseppe
AU - Craxì, Antonio
AU - Francioso, Simona
AU - Perno, Carlo Federico
AU - Pozzoni, Pietro
AU - Toniutto, Pier Luigi
AU - Zazzi, Maurizio
AU - Pérez, Ana Belén
AU - Quilez, Cristina
AU - Alados, Juan Carlos
AU - Cabezas, Joaquin
AU - Ruiz-Tapiador, Juan Ignacio Arenas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 European Association for the Study of the Liver
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Background & Aims: There are limited data on patients with chronic HCV infection in whom combination voxilaprevir (VOX), velpatasvir (VEL), sofosbuvir (SOF) retreatment fails. Thus, we aimed to assess treatment failure and rescue treatment options in these patients. Methods: Samples from 40 patients with HCV genotypes (GT) 1-4 in whom VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment failed were collected within the European Resistance Study Group. Population-based resistance analyses were conducted and clinical parameters and retreatment efficacies were evaluated retrospectively in 22 patients. Results: Most VOX/VEL/SOF failure patients were infected with HCV GT3a (n = 18, 45%) or GT1a (n = 11, 28%) and had cirrhosis (n = 28, 70%). Previous treatments included an NS3-inhibitor (30%), an NS5A-inhibitor (100%) and SOF (85%). Baseline RAS data from a subgroup of patients before VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment (78%) showed few NS3 RASs apart from Q80K in GT1a (40%), typical NS5A RAS patterns in most patients (74%) and no S282T in NS5B. Sequencing after VOX/VEL/SOF failure was available in 98% of patients and showed only minor changes for NS3 and NS5A RASs. In 22 patients, rescue treatment was initiated with glecaprevir, pibrentasvir alone (n = 2) or with SOF±ribavirin (n = 15), VOX/VEL/SOF±ribavirin (n = 4) or VEL/SOF and ribavirin (n = 1) for 12 to 24 weeks. Sustained virologic response was achieved in 17/21 (81%) patients with a final treatment outcome. Of these, 2 GT3a-infected patients had virologic failure after rescue treatment with VEL/SOF or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir+SOF+ribavirin, and 2 patients with cirrhosis died during treatment or before reaching SVR12. Conclusions: VOX/VEL/SOF failure was mainly observed in HCV GT3- and GT1a-infected patients with cirrhosis and was not associated with specific RAS patterns within NS3, NS5A or NS5B target regions. Rescue treatment with multiple targeted therapies was effective in most patients. Lay summary: The advent of direct-acting antivirals has enabled the effective cure of chronic hepatitis C in most patients. However, treatment failure occurs in some patients, who are often retreated with a combination regimen called VOX/VEL/SOF, which is associated with very high rates of cure. However, VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment also fails in some patients. Herein, we analysed samples from patients in whom VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment failed and we assessed the efficacy of different rescue therapies, showing that rescue treatment is effective in most patients (81%).
AB - Background & Aims: There are limited data on patients with chronic HCV infection in whom combination voxilaprevir (VOX), velpatasvir (VEL), sofosbuvir (SOF) retreatment fails. Thus, we aimed to assess treatment failure and rescue treatment options in these patients. Methods: Samples from 40 patients with HCV genotypes (GT) 1-4 in whom VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment failed were collected within the European Resistance Study Group. Population-based resistance analyses were conducted and clinical parameters and retreatment efficacies were evaluated retrospectively in 22 patients. Results: Most VOX/VEL/SOF failure patients were infected with HCV GT3a (n = 18, 45%) or GT1a (n = 11, 28%) and had cirrhosis (n = 28, 70%). Previous treatments included an NS3-inhibitor (30%), an NS5A-inhibitor (100%) and SOF (85%). Baseline RAS data from a subgroup of patients before VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment (78%) showed few NS3 RASs apart from Q80K in GT1a (40%), typical NS5A RAS patterns in most patients (74%) and no S282T in NS5B. Sequencing after VOX/VEL/SOF failure was available in 98% of patients and showed only minor changes for NS3 and NS5A RASs. In 22 patients, rescue treatment was initiated with glecaprevir, pibrentasvir alone (n = 2) or with SOF±ribavirin (n = 15), VOX/VEL/SOF±ribavirin (n = 4) or VEL/SOF and ribavirin (n = 1) for 12 to 24 weeks. Sustained virologic response was achieved in 17/21 (81%) patients with a final treatment outcome. Of these, 2 GT3a-infected patients had virologic failure after rescue treatment with VEL/SOF or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir+SOF+ribavirin, and 2 patients with cirrhosis died during treatment or before reaching SVR12. Conclusions: VOX/VEL/SOF failure was mainly observed in HCV GT3- and GT1a-infected patients with cirrhosis and was not associated with specific RAS patterns within NS3, NS5A or NS5B target regions. Rescue treatment with multiple targeted therapies was effective in most patients. Lay summary: The advent of direct-acting antivirals has enabled the effective cure of chronic hepatitis C in most patients. However, treatment failure occurs in some patients, who are often retreated with a combination regimen called VOX/VEL/SOF, which is associated with very high rates of cure. However, VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment also fails in some patients. Herein, we analysed samples from patients in whom VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment failed and we assessed the efficacy of different rescue therapies, showing that rescue treatment is effective in most patients (81%).
KW - DAA
KW - Direct-acting antivirals
KW - HCV
KW - Hepatitis C virus
KW - Rescue therapy
KW - Resistance-associated substitutions
KW - Voxilaprevir/velpatasvir/sofosbuvir
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101307346&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.11.017
DO - 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.11.017
M3 - Article
SN - 0168-8278
VL - 74
SP - 801
EP - 810
JO - Journal of Hepatology
JF - Journal of Hepatology
IS - 4
ER -