TY - JOUR
T1 - Excited State Dipole Moments in Solution
T2 - Comparison between State-Specific and Linear-Response TD-DFT Values
AU - Guido, Ciro Achille
AU - Mennucci, Benedetta
AU - Scalmani, Giovanni
AU - Jacquemin, Denis
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 American Chemical Society.
PY - 2018/3/13
Y1 - 2018/3/13
N2 - We compare different response schemes for coupling continuum solvation models to time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) for the determination of solvent effects on the excited state dipole moments of solvated molecules. In particular, linear-response (LR) and state-specific (SS) formalisms are compared. Using 20 low-lying electronic excitations, displaying both localized and charge-transfer character, this study highlights the importance of applying a SS model not only for the calculation of energies, as previously reported (J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2015, 11, 5782, DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00679), but also for the prediction of excited state properties. Generally, when a range-separated exchange-correlation functional is used, both LR and SS schemes provide very similar dipole moments for local transitions, whereas differences of a few Debye units with respect to LR values are observed for CT transitions. The delicate interplay between the response scheme and the exchange-correlation functional is discussed as well, and we show that using an inadequate functional in a SS framework can yield to dramatic overestimations of the dipole moments.
AB - We compare different response schemes for coupling continuum solvation models to time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) for the determination of solvent effects on the excited state dipole moments of solvated molecules. In particular, linear-response (LR) and state-specific (SS) formalisms are compared. Using 20 low-lying electronic excitations, displaying both localized and charge-transfer character, this study highlights the importance of applying a SS model not only for the calculation of energies, as previously reported (J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2015, 11, 5782, DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00679), but also for the prediction of excited state properties. Generally, when a range-separated exchange-correlation functional is used, both LR and SS schemes provide very similar dipole moments for local transitions, whereas differences of a few Debye units with respect to LR values are observed for CT transitions. The delicate interplay between the response scheme and the exchange-correlation functional is discussed as well, and we show that using an inadequate functional in a SS framework can yield to dramatic overestimations of the dipole moments.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85044005065
U2 - 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b01230
DO - 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b01230
M3 - Article
SN - 1549-9618
VL - 14
SP - 1544
EP - 1553
JO - Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
JF - Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
IS - 3
ER -